2019
DOI: 10.12737/art_2019_2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russian Legislative Tradition before the Challenge of Digitalization

Abstract: В современных условиях цифровизация оказывает влияние на все сферы общественных отношений, включая законотворчество. Внедрение цифровых технологий меняет процесс законотворческой деятельности, в результате чего ее традиционные механизмы оказываются недостаточно эффективными. Российская законотворческая традиция как исторически сложившаяся совокупность принципов и механизмов законотворческой деятельности, которая отражает ценностные ориентиры общества, оказавшись перед вызовом цифровизации, претерпевает серьезн… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One cannot but listen to D.A. Pashentsev, who, while agreeing with the opinion of T. Y. Khabrieva, notes that "in the context of digitalization of public relations [...] there is a need to expand the arsenal of regulators used [...] in the future, this may lead to the fact that legislation will lose its former role, which will inevitably affect the scale and directions of legislative activity [...] This trend is objective [...]" [11].According to a number of foreign scientists, society is undergoing a digital transformation as artificial intelligence and other technologies develop to optimize decision-making and improve operational efficiency, which can hinder the effectiveness of public institutions responsible for adopting, regulating and enforcing the law [13].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One cannot but listen to D.A. Pashentsev, who, while agreeing with the opinion of T. Y. Khabrieva, notes that "in the context of digitalization of public relations [...] there is a need to expand the arsenal of regulators used [...] in the future, this may lead to the fact that legislation will lose its former role, which will inevitably affect the scale and directions of legislative activity [...] This trend is objective [...]" [11].According to a number of foreign scientists, society is undergoing a digital transformation as artificial intelligence and other technologies develop to optimize decision-making and improve operational efficiency, which can hinder the effectiveness of public institutions responsible for adopting, regulating and enforcing the law [13].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In connection with the identified problem, in the context of the need to transform legal regulation in connection with the development of digital technologies, it is justified to use another relatively new method of legal regulation, which is conventionally called the "legal experiment". Thence, Pashentsev (2019) analysed the impact of digitalization on the Russian law-making tradition and identifying promising directions for its further development, noted among the identified trends the more active use of legal forecasting and legal experiment in legislative activity. Zhuravleva (2018) makes a distinction between the legal regulation of pilot projects and a legal experiment based on the following criterion: "the question of whether an idea will be accepted or rejected is not posed or decided during the implementation of pilot projects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В связи с обозначенной проблемой в условиях необходимости трансформации правового регулирования в связи с развитием цифровых технологий оправданным является использование еще одного сравнительно нового способа правового регулирования, который условно по-лучил наименование «правовой эксперимент». Так, Д. А. Пашенцев, анализируя влияние цифровизации на российскую законотворческую традицию и определяя перспективные направления ее дальнейшего развития, отметил среди выявленных тенденций более активное использование в законотворческой деятельности правового прогнозирования и правового эксперимента [1]. О. О. Журавлева проводит разграничение правового регулирования пилотных проектов и правового эксперимента на основании следующего критерия: «Вопрос о том, будет ли принята или отвергнута идея, в процессе осуществления пилотных проектов не ставится и не решается.…”
Section: ***unclassified