Rural‐to‐Urban Commuting: Three Degrees of Integration

Abstract

Commuting ties between rural places of residence and urban places of employment are among the most visible forms of rural-urban integration. For some rural areas, access to urban employment is a key source of population retention and growth. However, this access varies considerably across rural areas, with distance representing a primary deterrent. In addition to distance, the size of the urban community will also influence rural-to-urban commuting opportunities. In this paper, using Canadian data, we empirically estimated the influence of local rural population and job growth on rural out-commuting within the urban hierarchy. We find consistent support for the deconcentration hypothesis where population moves to rural areas for lifestyle and quality of life reasons, while retaining urban employment. Further, we find some evidence that in addition to distance from the nearest urban center being a deterrent, increased remoteness from the top of the urban hierarchy exerts a "positive" influence on out-commuting. Recognition of these types of rural-urban linkages through commuting is essential in designing Canadian rural policy and targeted programs that may effectively support local rural populations. In particular, they point to the need to have reasonable transportation infrastructure for urban accessibility, which should be complemented by other "built" infrastructure to improve the livability of rural communities. Copyright (c) 2010 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc..

The nuanced nature of work quality: Evidence from rural Newfoundland and Ireland

“…Depending upon the degree of remoteness and level of population, rural individuals could have fewer local employment options and might have to manage their lives despite having only limited employment income (Anam and Chiang, 2007;Partridge et al, 2010;Vera-Toscano et al, 2004). This research focused mainly on 'older' workers (of 40+ years of age) among rural workers, since it was presumed that, relative to younger workers, they might have different perceptions of work and different financial expectations and requirements and because rural communities are grappling with the impacts of aging populations (see Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2005).…”

Does Agglomeration Matter Everywhere?: New Firm Location Decisions in Rural and Urban Markets*

“…On the other hand, agglomeration economies can spill over to surrounding areas so that rural areas can access urban agglomeration benefits through commuting (Partridge, Ali, and Olfert, 2010). For this reason, positive impacts of urban agglomeration are found in rural areas within a commuting distance of cities (Barkley et al, 1996;Partridge et al, 2007.…”

Metropolitan Spillover Effects and Economic Growth of Non-Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from Indiana Counties

“…People might choose to live in the non-metro areas, which usually have a lower living cost, and commute to the metro areas in order to pursue a higher paying job (Partridge, Ali, & Olfert, 2010). Cheshire and Carbonaro (1996) showed that a strong positive relationship exists among the length of a commuting trip, income, and measures of human capital.…”