Rural Poverty Reduction and Economic Transformation in China: A Decomposition Approach

Abstract

Rural poverty in China fell from 96 percent in 1980 to less than 1 percent of the population in 2019. Using PovcalNet data for China and a set of comparable countries, this paper estimates growth-poverty elasticities. It finds that China stands out for its record of sustained, fast growth, rather than because of an unusually high growth-poverty elasticity. In addition, changes in mean consumption, rather than changes in the distribution, drive poverty reduction. Furthermore, until 2010, changes in inequality attenuated the impact of growth on poverty. The paper also studies which channels mattered the most for rural poverty reduction by applying a decomposition framework to multiple rounds of Chinese Household Income Project surveys conducted in 1988, 1995, 2002, 2007, 2013, and 2018. The findings show that broad-based, labor-intensive growth in agriculture was initially the main driving force for rural poverty reduction, followed by the expansion of non-agriculture sectors. As the country’s poverty rate approached 10 percent by 2007, transfers from migrant workers and, later, public transfers became the major drivers of further rural poverty reduction. Throughout the period, the fall in the demographic dependency rate also played a significant role. As China’s living standards continue to rise, the official definition of poverty will have to adjust to the higher minimum. Continued structural transformation and the inclusive growth agenda retain crucial importance for sustained poverty reduction. (Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper)

Health vulnerability and health poverty of rice farmers: evidence from Hubei province in China

“…In 2021, China declared a “complete victory” in its fight against absolute poverty, reporting that all impoverished residents in rural China have all been lifted out of poverty (Lugo et al ., 2021; WB, 2022). However, the risks and challenges of returning to poverty remain present for rural households (Hu and Zeng, 2019).…”

The UNHCR Refugee Zakat Fund: beyond the OIC

“…The refugees, vulnerable populace, and the broad group classified as 'people of concern' are not only found within the OIC member states [35,36]. These classified groups of individuals are scattered across almost every region of the globe; however, in varying proportions [37,38]. Keeping in mind, monies collected through Zakat donations can only be disbursed amongst Muslim faithful [13], which raises the concern for non-Muslims who may equally be in pitiable condition similar to that of the refugees or 'people of concern' .…”

“…According to available data, these religions are practices by an above 80 percent of the citizens of respective countries [40]. More so, according the United Nations classification, these four countries are categorized as countries with a significant proportion of populace living below the poverty line of $1.90 per day [37,41]. Hence, these countries serve as typified non-Muslim majority countries with high levels of poverty.…”

The Impacts of the Poverty Alleviation Relocation Program (PARP) on Households’ Education Investment: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Rural China

“…China implemented an extensive poverty alleviation effort from 2016 to 2020, ultimately leading to the official declaration that absolute poverty had been eliminated from the country's rural regions in early 2021 [32]. While several studies have investigated the spillover effects of poverty alleviation policies on family education investment during this period in rural China, focusing on targeted poverty alleviation [33], industrial poverty alleviation [34], and financial poverty alleviation policies [35], none have yet examined the impact of the Poverty Alleviation Relocation Policy on household education investment.…”