2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum (5GWF) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/5gwf52925.2021.00064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Macrocell Path Loss Measurements for 5G Fixed Wireless Access at 26 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They trained this model with 28 GHz path loss data and compared it to four existing empirical models, revealing its strong performance, particularly in high-band frequencies [63]. Additionally, a comparison between the single-frequency FI model and the single-frequency CI models indicated their similar performance across all frequencies under line-of-sight scenarios [64][65][66]. However, it is important to note that the measurement did not account for material properties, which may have contributed to the symmetrical behavior of the data due to potential reflection and diffraction effects.…”
Section: Reviewed Papers On Empirical-based Path Loss Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They trained this model with 28 GHz path loss data and compared it to four existing empirical models, revealing its strong performance, particularly in high-band frequencies [63]. Additionally, a comparison between the single-frequency FI model and the single-frequency CI models indicated their similar performance across all frequencies under line-of-sight scenarios [64][65][66]. However, it is important to note that the measurement did not account for material properties, which may have contributed to the symmetrical behavior of the data due to potential reflection and diffraction effects.…”
Section: Reviewed Papers On Empirical-based Path Loss Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough measuring campaign at 26 GHz was conducted over the course of the summer in two remote areas of southern Finland, according to Saba et al [66]. The collected data demonstrate that the mean path loss increased from 4 to 6 dB for every 20 m increase in antenna height.…”
Section: Los and Nlos Indoormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional PL predictions are primarily categorized into deterministic methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and empirical methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. For deterministic methods, PL is typically modeled through the ray tracing (RT) technique combined with environmental information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [17] measured the PL in a citrus plantation, and analyzed the measurement results based on the two-ray model, close-in (CI) free space reference distance PL model, and so on. For A2G scenarios, the authors in [20] investigated the effects of different transmission antenna heights on PL in rural scenarios at 26 GHz using a crane as a research platform, and analyzed the fitting performance of different empirical models, such as the CI and alpha-beta-gamma models. The authors in [21,22], respectively, studied channel parameters such as the received signal strength indicator of ZigBee and the WiFi link in farmland scenarios based on UAVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%