Rural Livelihood Vulnerability and Resilience: a Typology Drawn from Case Studies of Small-Scale Farmers and Fishermen in Indonesia

Abstract

Various studies on rural household livelihood systems have been carried out in Indonesia to explain the level of household livelihood vulnerability in both farming and fishing communities. The livelihood of small-scale farmers and fishermen is usually vulnerable due to climate and non-climate pressure. This desk study compares the results of studies on livelihood vulnerability from various theses, dissertations and scientific journal articles with a similar topic of study. A case study analysis is used to figure out a comparative picture of small-scale farmers and fishermen households in responding to the pressure as well as making adaptive actions to survive. The weakness of this study is that the conclusion cannot provide evidences as a basis for deriving generalization. Rather it only provides an initial description of the socioeconomic responses as shown by small-scale farmers and fishermen in reacting to ecological pressures. This study comes up with a typology of pressure faced by small-scale farmers and fishermen households. There are four types of stressor that are identified, i.e., climate variability, capital farm expansion, rural-infrastructure development, and economic actorcompetitions. In responding to livelihood vulnerability, most of small-scale farmers and fishermen build their resiliency by using resources under the controlled household system while others use external sources.

The impact of farmland transfer participation on farmers' livelihood choices – an empirical study of the effectiveness of the 2014 Three Property Rights Separation reform

“…By employing the framework of the SLA, further comprehensive studies (Bhandari, 2013;Liu and Liu, 2016;Hua et al, 2017;Pour et al, 2018) have confirmed the great importance of various types of livelihood capital to household livelihood strategy decisions. In addition to within-household driving factors, some studies place more emphasis on the influencing factors of shocks from social-economic-ecological changes (Dharmawan and Manig, 2000;Schraven, 2010;Poudel and Shaw, 2015), policy and institutional environments (Chen et al, 2013;Zhen et al, 2014) and tourism development (Mbaiwa, 2011;Kheiri and Nasihatkon, 2016). These help us design the analytical framework.…”

Integration of Tacit and Explicit Strategies in Sustainable Livelihood Recovery: A Case Study on Project-Affected Communities of a Hydropower Plant in West Java, Indonesia

“…The implication is that many PAC men and women do not know about the explicit strategy. The livelihoods of rural communities cannot be generalized because they are interrelated [64,68,69].…”

COVID-19 containment measures of the Government of Kenya: Impact on food security and farmers’ socio-economic life

“…An individual household's adaptive capacities determine climatic vulnerability. The impact of climate change is also determined by the magnitude and extent of households affected (Dharmawan & Nissa 2020). Such is the case of flooding, landslides, and earth movements in Kenya during the heavy rains in April, May, and even June; however, not all families were adversely affected, while others displace amid the COVID-19 scare.…”