2020
DOI: 10.1017/aae.2019.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Finance, Capital Constrained Small Farms, and Financial Performance: Findings from a Primary Survey

Abstract: Capital and credit constraints limit the small farm’s ability to adequately use resources for optimum performance. Farmers’ access to capital is constrained in multiple ways, including price factors, risk factors, and transaction factors, as well as access to and ease of rural agricultural financing. Using a primary survey data of small farms in Tennessee, we analyzed factors influencing credit constraint and its impact on farm performance. Farm operators’ gender, off-farm work, land acreage holdings, farm spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such practices will give rise to duality, where wealthy farmers will enjoy growth through the use of modern technology, whereas SMFs will underperform. There is evidence of a rise in productivity for those who had better access to finance and modern technology (Cuffaro, 2001;Patel, 2004;Jodhka, 2006;Purohit et al, 2015;Bhattacharya, 2017;Khanal and Omobitan, 2020). In the case of India, wealthy farmers will become wealthier, whereas SMFs farmers will decline in numbers because of their inability to use appropriate technology and to obtain loans at competitive rates from formal institutions (Sharma and Chamala, 2003;Srivastva and Basu, 2004;Vaidyanathan, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such practices will give rise to duality, where wealthy farmers will enjoy growth through the use of modern technology, whereas SMFs will underperform. There is evidence of a rise in productivity for those who had better access to finance and modern technology (Cuffaro, 2001;Patel, 2004;Jodhka, 2006;Purohit et al, 2015;Bhattacharya, 2017;Khanal and Omobitan, 2020). In the case of India, wealthy farmers will become wealthier, whereas SMFs farmers will decline in numbers because of their inability to use appropriate technology and to obtain loans at competitive rates from formal institutions (Sharma and Chamala, 2003;Srivastva and Basu, 2004;Vaidyanathan, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a multiagency, approach was envisaged to cater for the diverse credit needs of rural people. It has been suggested (Satyasai, 2008;Golait, 2007;Singh et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2010;Sandhu Banks' lending practices et al, 2015;Bhattacharya, 2017;Khanal and Omobitan, 2020) that in reality, the rural clientele hardly benefited from multiple providers of finance as the system suffered from many infrastructural deficiencies. These structural and operational framework changes facilitated the process of institutionalisation and the regulation of the rural financial market in India to some extent.…”
Section: Banks' Lending Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Western countries, however, there is less research. Examples are Besser and Miller (2013) on U.S. rural entrepreneurs, Civelek et al (2019) on Slovak weak funding bias compared to Czech Republic, and Khanal and Omobitan (2020) on factors influencing credit constraints of farms in the U.S.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%