Rural Development Transformation and Social Governance from the Perspective of Specialization: A Case Study of Ruiling Village in Guangzhou City, China

Lin, Yuancheng; Yang, Ren; Li, Simeng

doi:10.1007/s11769-023-1380-y

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gao et al (2017) analyzed that the development of rural tourism is not only conducive to the preservation of the history and culture of traditional villages but also contributes to the revitalization and sustainable development of villages [8]. Lin et al (2023) found that rural social governance can promote the sustainable development of rural villages by taking the famous Bonsai village of Guangzhou as a typical case [9]. Cui et al (2023) explored the evolution characteristics and driving mechanism of regional functions in the agricultural and pastoral intertwined zone based on the "element-structure-function" framework, and realized the coordinated development of rural regional functions by promoting the coupling of population, land and industry [10].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does New Urbanization Support the Rural Inclusive Green Development under Domestic Circulation in China?

Hua,

Zhang,

Ding

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New urbanization is an endogenous driving force to enhance domestic circulation. Driving the development of rural industries with urbanization to achieve interactive symbiosis has become an important topic to promote the coordinated development of urban and rural green. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2009 to 2021, this paper constructs an evaluation index system for new urbanization and rural inclusive green development, and uses principal component analysis and panel regression model to analyze the impact of new-type urbanization on inclusive green development in rural areas. The results of the study show the following: (1) Rural inclusive green development and new urbanization have been significantly improved during the study period, but there are significant regional differences. (2) The construction of the new urbanization significantly promotes rural inclusive green development, but there is significant spatial heterogeneity. This effect is more significant in the Eastern and Central regions. (3) Population urbanization, land urbanization, social urbanization, and environmental urbanization can effectively promote rural inclusive green development, but economic urbanization will have a negative impact on green development in the countryside during the study period. Therefore, it is necessary to further strengthen the leading role of central cities and urban agglomerations, to promote the countryside with the city and at the same time to combat environmental pollution and to create ecologically livable towns and villages. In addition, the government should strengthen top-level design, provide industrial support to backward areas, improve the spatial layout of urbanization, and promote the deepening of new urbanization.

show abstract