Rural chronic disease research patterns in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand: a systematic integrative review

Abstract

Background: People living in rural and remote communities commonly experience significant health disadvantages. Geographical barriers and reduced specialist and generalist services impact access to care when compared with metropolitan context. Innovative models of care have been developed for people living with chronic diseases in rural areas with the goal of overcoming these inequities. The aim of this paper was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of studies investigating innovative models of care for people living with chronic disease in rural areas of developed countries where a metropolitan comparator was included. Methods: An integrative systematic review was undertaken. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was used to understand the empirical and theoretical data on clinical outcomes for people living with chronic disease in rural compared with metropolitan contexts and their models of care in Australia, New Zealand, United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Results: Literature searching revealed 620 articles published in English between 1st January 2000 and 31st March 2019. One hundred sixty were included in the review including 68 from the United States, 59 from Australia and New Zealand (5), 21 from Canada and 11 from the United Kingdom and Ireland. 53% (84) focused on cardiovascular disease; 27% (43) diabetes mellitus; 8% (12) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and 13% (27) chronic kidney disease. Mortality was only reported in 10% (16) of studies and only 18% (29) reported data on Indigenous populations. Conclusions: This integrated review reveals that the published literature on common chronic health issues pertaining to rural and remote populations is largely descriptive. Only a small number of publications focus on mortality and comparative health outcomes from health care models in both urban and non-urban populations. Innovative service models and telehealth are together well represented in the published literature but data on health outcomes is relatively sparse. There is significant scope for further directly comparative studies detailing the effect of service delivery models on the health outcomes of urban and rural populations. We believe that such data would further knowledge in this field and help to break the deadly synergy between increased rurality and poorer outcomes for people with chronic disease.

Pharmacists’ interventions improve health-related quality of life of rural older person on warfarin: a randomized controlled trial

“…Warfarin-related research has shown that individuals in the lowest socio-economic status category and those living in rural areas were at a significantly increased risk of elevated INR levels 3 . Further, older rural patients tend to have lower socio-economic status and educational level and often have limited access to healthcare 4 . Moreover, there is concern that some patients, particularly those from a rural location, may not perceive a significant benefit in transitioning from warfarin to DOACs or may have concerns and therefore are not good candidates for being prescribed DOACs 5 .…”

Strengthening Saudi Arabia’s Primary Health Care through an e-Referral System: A Case Study

“…This study shows that patients referred by PHC centres outside the 13 km radius tend to be younger than those referred by PHC centres closer to the hospital, and this result is both statistically and practically significant. One explanation for this is that the incidence rates of chronic diseases, disability, and age-adjusted mortality among young people who live far from full-service hospitals are higher than those among people who live close to these hospitals [ 14 ].…”

Functional Health Literacy and Doctor-Patient Communication: Experiences of HIV/AIDS Patients in Homa Bay County, Kenya

“…Unfortunately, inadequate functional health literacy appears to be a widespread problem among patients with chronic health conditions. A study conducted by Bradley [4] shows that in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Canada, twenty to fifty percent of the population have low functional health literacy, which can have negative effects on an individual's health status [4] [6]. A recent study by Rademakers and Hejimans [2] further revealed that four out of ten Dutch men and women with chronic disease have inadequate functional health literacy.…”

“…For instance, in the North American population, 9 out of every ten adults lack requisite competency to manage their health and prevent diseases [3]. Previous studies show that in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Canada, from twenty to fifty percent of the population have low functional health literacy, which can negatively affect an individual's health status [4] [5] [6]. what is read and the meaning of numbers presented to them [2].…”