2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0743-0167(99)00027-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural areas in the information society: diminishing distance or increasing learning capacity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is furthermore implicit in publications such as the European Commission report eEurope: An Information Society For All (European Commission 2000) with its aim of bringing the benefits of the Information Society to all Europeans. Various studies in the US and UK (Parker 2000) Ilbery and Clark 1995;Berkeley, Clark et al 1996;Grimes 2000) indicate differences in adoption rates be- tween urban and rural households and/or businesses, suggesting an urban-rural divide. Hindman, in reporting on an empirical study in the US, measured an increasing difference between rural and metropolitan areas in an Information Technology Index between 1995 and 1998.…”
Section: The Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is furthermore implicit in publications such as the European Commission report eEurope: An Information Society For All (European Commission 2000) with its aim of bringing the benefits of the Information Society to all Europeans. Various studies in the US and UK (Parker 2000) Ilbery and Clark 1995;Berkeley, Clark et al 1996;Grimes 2000) indicate differences in adoption rates be- tween urban and rural households and/or businesses, suggesting an urban-rural divide. Hindman, in reporting on an empirical study in the US, measured an increasing difference between rural and metropolitan areas in an Information Technology Index between 1995 and 1998.…”
Section: The Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rural areas are more or less affected (depending on the distance from markets and access to services) by the problem of peripheralization/ marginalization (Grimes, 2000). The problem of the digital divide in the rural areas is a concern not only for developing countries but also for those highly developed, like the United States (Pick, Sarkar, Johnson, 2015), Japan (Nishida, Pick, Sarkar, 2014), Australia (Park, 2016) or the European Union (Vicente, López, 2011).…”
Section: Rural Digital Divide In the European Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Balakrishnan (2002), if ICT services are applied well by rural communities, it can enhance knowledge, skills, employability, income and social network. Grimes (2000) also emphasizes that use of the Internet in an ICT center gives people an opportunity to learn new things, thus producing knowledgeable rural communities ('k-society'). Rao (2004) demonstrates that rural ICT programs that promote Internet usage can enhance the level of knowledge among a rural community.…”
Section: Attitude Towards Information and Communications Technology (mentioning
confidence: 99%