2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20976-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural African American Adolescents’ Development: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies and Preventive Intervention Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, adapting cultural systems that were working in one context or time may work less well (e.g., be neutralized or become counterproductive) in a new context or time. Notably, psychological interventions may be especially critical during these lags, as culturally relevant and sensitive interventions (Gándara, Rumberger, Maxwell-Jolly, & Callahan, 2003; Murry, Liu, & Bethune, 2016) can represent environmental reactions to emerging needs within adapting cultural systems. For example, interventions have been successfully implemented to help communities, families, and individuals deal with macrotime shifts in environmental affordances associated with changing (a) U.S. demographics (Umaña-Taylor et al, 2017), (b) public health and behavioral health needs (Murry et al, 2016), or (c) education policies (Gándara et al, 2003).…”
Section: Advancing the Adapting Cultural Systems Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, adapting cultural systems that were working in one context or time may work less well (e.g., be neutralized or become counterproductive) in a new context or time. Notably, psychological interventions may be especially critical during these lags, as culturally relevant and sensitive interventions (Gándara, Rumberger, Maxwell-Jolly, & Callahan, 2003; Murry, Liu, & Bethune, 2016) can represent environmental reactions to emerging needs within adapting cultural systems. For example, interventions have been successfully implemented to help communities, families, and individuals deal with macrotime shifts in environmental affordances associated with changing (a) U.S. demographics (Umaña-Taylor et al, 2017), (b) public health and behavioral health needs (Murry et al, 2016), or (c) education policies (Gándara et al, 2003).…”
Section: Advancing the Adapting Cultural Systems Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our review of critical protective factors that may buffer adolescents and young adults from succumbing to challenges associated with growing up in lower resource, rural communities, we consider how these factors and processes can be captured in preventive interventions. Studies indicate that targeted interventions integrating family contexts may be especially protective (Brody et al, 2012;Murry et al, 2016). In particular, investigations show that involved, supportive, and vigilant parenting has been associated with youth risk engagement prevention, with prolonged effects as youth transition from adolescence into adulthood (Brody et al, 2013;Murry, Berkel, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Preventive Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in protective factors and adaptive processes have been observed across geographic location (Metzger et al, 2018), residential characteristics (Elder & Conger, 2000;Rhew et al, 2011), economic disadvantage (Ge et al, 2002), and gender (Milot & Ludden, 2009;Wexler et al, 2016). Critical variations among racial and ethnic groups have been noted, suggesting that racial and sociohistorical contexts provide an important framework for risk reduction and protective processes that may inform cultural assets and processes among rural youth (Kiang & Supple, 2016;Murry et al, 2016;Stein et al, 2016). Additionally, studies have demonstrated how gender shapes future orientation and time perspective and planning for transitions among rural youth (e.g., M. K. Johnson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Protective Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing reviews of substance use among Black people are limited in scope. Specifically, these reviews focused narrowly on specific subgroups such as youth (Chipungu et al, 2000;Lauricella, Valdez, Okamoto, Helm, & Zaremba, 2016; Y. M. Lee, Cintron, & Kocher, 2014), rural adolescents (McBride Murry, Liu, & Bethune, 2016), incarcerated males (Lichtenstein, 2009), rural males (Brown & Smith, 2006), females (Davis & Ancis, 2012), or individuals with alcohol use disorder (Sutherland & Ericson, 2010). The one comprehensive review of 23 articles was limited to research conducted by social workers, focused only on substance use interventions, and few of the samples were exclusively Black (Clark et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%