1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60996-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rupture of the Posterior Urethra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, in 1972, Morehouse et al . [27] drew attention to the poor results of both these approaches and pointed out that, as a result,…”
Section: Posterior Urethral Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, in 1972, Morehouse et al . [27] drew attention to the poor results of both these approaches and pointed out that, as a result,…”
Section: Posterior Urethral Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, although it is indeed less traumatic than oPR there is no reason to suppose that the results should be any better as the end result is the same. Thirdly, it has already been noted that PR makes straddle injuries of the bulbar urethra worse than SPC alone [15,16] and that the results of oPR for PFUIs left a lot to be desired [27]. Fourthly, as discussed in Part I [1], it has been shown experimentally that a partial injury may well heal whether or not it is stented with a catheter and a complete injury will never heal with a urethral catheter alone, in other words without suturing the [19].…”
Section: Fig 8 Augmented Bbasuturing the Two Ends Of The Urethra Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traumatic urethral injury is usually treated conservatively with an indwelling urethral catheter [1]. However, after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum, healing of the prostatic urethra is apparently more difficult because there is no supporting tissue behind the urethra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of associated injuries frequently pre cludes a time-consuming definitive urethral recon structive procedure. Finally, the results have not been too impressive (Morehouse et al, 1972). Most urologists have preferred not to resect the pubis or separate the symphysis to improve exposure when there is an already fractured pelvis, and elect to approximate the severed ends of the urethra over a traction catheter or with apical prostatic suture placed through the perineum (Waterhouse and Gross, 1969;DeWeerd, 1959;Kaiser and Farrow, 1965).…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%