2022
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.832633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runs of Homozygosity Uncover Potential Functional-Altering Mutation Associated With Body Weight and Length in Two Duroc Pig Lines

Abstract: Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are widely used to investigate genetic diversity, demographic history, and positive selection signatures of livestock. Commercial breeds provide excellent materials to reveal the landscape of ROH shaped during the intense selection process. Here, we used the GeneSeek Porcine 50K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Chip data of 3,770 American Duroc (AD) and 2,096 Canadian Duroc (CD) pigs to analyze the genome-wide ROH. First, we showed that AD had a moderate genetic differentiation w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, this may be due to the sample bias, whereas on the other hand, the difference may result from the two Duroc lines experiencing different selection directions and intensities. The later hypothesis was in line with our previous studies that S22 had more strong selection on the production performance than S21 pigs ( 34 ), and S21 may have a special selection for reproduction and S22 may have a special selection for immunity ( 43 ). In the breeding program, superior individuals always had more mating opportunities than inferior individuals, which may reduce the number of harmful ROHs in the population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, this may be due to the sample bias, whereas on the other hand, the difference may result from the two Duroc lines experiencing different selection directions and intensities. The later hypothesis was in line with our previous studies that S22 had more strong selection on the production performance than S21 pigs ( 34 ), and S21 may have a special selection for reproduction and S22 may have a special selection for immunity ( 43 ). In the breeding program, superior individuals always had more mating opportunities than inferior individuals, which may reduce the number of harmful ROHs in the population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The number of significantly adverse ROHs on the economic traits (except for BFT) of S21 was larger than that of S22 pigs. The population inbreeding coefficient may be positively correlated with the number of adverse ROHs; however, our previous study found that S21 pigs had lower inbreeding levels than S22 pigs ( 43 ). On the one hand, this may be due to the sample bias, whereas on the other hand, the difference may result from the two Duroc lines experiencing different selection directions and intensities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Cinta Sense and Mora Romagnola showed ROH islands already found in previous studies (Schiavo, Bovo, Bertolini, et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022), including genes related to productive traits (Puig-Oliveras et al, 2014) and reproductive traits (Chen et al, 2019;He et al, 2017;Nonneman et al, 2016;Schneider et al, 2015). Large White and Pietrain also evidenced ROH islands previously reported with a high percentage in the same breeds (Gorssen et al, 2019;Schiavo, Bovo, Bertolini, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Roh and Rohet Islandssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Nevertheless, none of these mechanisms can fully explain the presence of no-ROH regions, therefore other mechanisms and their combinations are likely involved. It can also be assumed that the no-ROH regions detected in this study are ROH cold spots, as described by, e.g., Wang et al [ 67 ]. These cold spot regions were suggested to be produced through high recombination rates and are likely enriched for variants with severe adverse effects on fitness in homozygotes [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%