2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various machine learning methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs), which include back-propagation neural network (BPNN), radial basis function (RBF) neural network, generalized regression neural network (GRNN), Elman neural network, and multilayer feed-forward (MLFF) network, are among the most popular techniques for hydrological time series forecasting [17]. Although data driven models have attained high levels in the hydrological field, there is still space present to improve the forecasting methods [18]. Hydrological processes are non-linear and arbitrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various machine learning methods, artificial neural networks (ANNs), which include back-propagation neural network (BPNN), radial basis function (RBF) neural network, generalized regression neural network (GRNN), Elman neural network, and multilayer feed-forward (MLFF) network, are among the most popular techniques for hydrological time series forecasting [17]. Although data driven models have attained high levels in the hydrological field, there is still space present to improve the forecasting methods [18]. Hydrological processes are non-linear and arbitrary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies reported that integration of wavelet transformation technique with ANN yields superior results compared to simple ANN and regression models (Anctil & Tape 2004;Chou & Wang 2004;Zhou et al 2006;Partal & Kisi 2007;Nourani et al 2008;Kisi 2008bKisi , 2009aRemesan et al 2009). This advanced pre-processing of raw data to capture the non-stationary behaviour of the time series data by decomposing the original series into wavelet coefficients of different frequency bands has been effectively applied by site is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M test analysis on the 30 min data is shown in Figure 3 To check the authenticity of GT analysis, we performed a cross-correlation analysis (Tayfur & Guldal 2006) between the target runoff dataset Q(t) and different lag time series of precipitation and runoff using daily rainfallrunoff data. A study by Remesan et al (2009) identified three-step antecedent runoff values (Q(t 2 1), Q(t 2 2), Q(t 2 3)), one-step antecedent rainfall (P(t 2 1)) and current rainfall information (P(t)) are the best for daily rainfall -runoff modelling, with a training data length of 1,056 data points. The cross-correlation analysis between the target runoff dataset Q(t) and different lag time series of precipitation and runoff data (viz.…”
Section: The Gamma Statistic (G) and Standard Error (Se) Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel technique, the Gamma Test, enables us to quickly evaluate and estimate the best mean squared error that can be achieved by a smooth model on unseen data for a given selection of inputs, prior to complex and time-consuming model construction. The abilities of GT have been demonstrated in case studies in water level and flow modelling (Durrant 2001;Remesan et al 2009), daily solar radiation prediction (Remesan et al 2008;Moghaddamnia et al 2009) and evapotranspiration estimation (Ghafari et al 2009;Piri et al 2009). This technique can be used to find the best embedded dimensions and time lags for time series analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%