2017
DOI: 10.1080/0267257x.2017.1329224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Running wild in the marketplace: the articulation and negotiation of an alternative food network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The facilitation of practical experiences within daily lives enables people to engage with food, and realize the values of food related to pleasure, culture, social identities, healthy lifestyles, and sustainable food systems. This finding is consistent with other studies linking everyday interactions surrounding food with people's motivation to engage with food, increasing their food knowledge, and promoting social, cultural, ethical, and environmental values, and sustainable food practices [24,[49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The facilitation of practical experiences within daily lives enables people to engage with food, and realize the values of food related to pleasure, culture, social identities, healthy lifestyles, and sustainable food systems. This finding is consistent with other studies linking everyday interactions surrounding food with people's motivation to engage with food, increasing their food knowledge, and promoting social, cultural, ethical, and environmental values, and sustainable food practices [24,[49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is often done in the context of urban agriculture. Another recent paper studied a Wild Food Network [64], which authors conceptualize as an emerging form of AFN.…”
Section: Rq2 What Types Of Afns Have Been Studied In Relation To Susmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The educative value of each theme has been independently identified previously, 11,32,43,44 however this is the first known study to bring together these five themes as a package rather than as individual elements. Participants themselves did not systematically think about pedagogical processes and did not generally use a learning framework to inform their food education or policy activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%