Abstract:Systematic variation of the pre-disruption core electron temperature (T e ) from 1 to 12 keV using an internal transport barrier scenario reveals a dramatic increase in the production of 'seed' runaway electrons (REs), ultimately accessing near-complete conversion of the pre-disruption current into sub-MeV RE current. Injected Ar pellets are observed to ablate more intensely and promptly as T e rises. At high T e , the observed ablation exceeds predictions from published thermal ablation models. Simultaneously… Show more
“…The increased avalanche rate due to partial screening is not included here; 20 this correction is not thought to be large in these shots due to the low plasma current and low resulting loop voltage. 12 As discussed later, it is possible that Dreicer hot electron formation is not negligible during the CQ of these shots; this results in significant uncertainty in the post-TQ hot electron current, as indicated by the estimated error bars in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additional details of these discharges were provided in a previous study. 12 The main diagnostics used in this work are a fast-framing visible camera, electron cyclotron emission (ECE), and a soft x-ray (SXR) array. The visible camera is bandpass filtered to isolate Ar-I 695 nm emission with a 5 nm bandpass and is aimed to view the injected Ar pellet injection region to measure neutral argon ablation and estimate local argon deposition into the plasma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard method for estimating post-TQ hot electron current in DIII-D disruptions is to ignore radial loss and new hot electron formation, in which case hot electron current evolution is, typically, dominated by avalanche gain. 11,12 In this case, the post-TQ hot electron current can be estimated from RE plateau current at the end of the CQ and from the avalanche growth rate; 14 in these two shots, this method gives post-TQ hot electron currents of about 300 kA (early shutdown) and 100 kA (late shutdown), as shown in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Post-TQ hot electron current is clearly seen to increase with increasing central plasma temperature, supporting the picture that the TQ is a net creator of superthermal electrons, i.e., more hot electrons are created by the hot tail mechanism than lost by radial transport during the TQ in mid-sized tokamaks. 12 After the TQ, the resulting cold (T e % 5 eV) current quench (CQ) plasma is thought to heal stochastic regions rapidly (on a 0.1 ms timescale), resulting in greatly reduced radial loss of hot electrons during the CQ, although this belief is based entirely on simulations. 8,9 There is experimental evidence that MHD modes or turbulence can cause loss of REs during the CQ, 13 but this loss term has not been quantified and is typically ignored.…”
“…The increased avalanche rate due to partial screening is not included here; 20 this correction is not thought to be large in these shots due to the low plasma current and low resulting loop voltage. 12 As discussed later, it is possible that Dreicer hot electron formation is not negligible during the CQ of these shots; this results in significant uncertainty in the post-TQ hot electron current, as indicated by the estimated error bars in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additional details of these discharges were provided in a previous study. 12 The main diagnostics used in this work are a fast-framing visible camera, electron cyclotron emission (ECE), and a soft x-ray (SXR) array. The visible camera is bandpass filtered to isolate Ar-I 695 nm emission with a 5 nm bandpass and is aimed to view the injected Ar pellet injection region to measure neutral argon ablation and estimate local argon deposition into the plasma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard method for estimating post-TQ hot electron current in DIII-D disruptions is to ignore radial loss and new hot electron formation, in which case hot electron current evolution is, typically, dominated by avalanche gain. 11,12 In this case, the post-TQ hot electron current can be estimated from RE plateau current at the end of the CQ and from the avalanche growth rate; 14 in these two shots, this method gives post-TQ hot electron currents of about 300 kA (early shutdown) and 100 kA (late shutdown), as shown in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Post-TQ hot electron current is clearly seen to increase with increasing central plasma temperature, supporting the picture that the TQ is a net creator of superthermal electrons, i.e., more hot electrons are created by the hot tail mechanism than lost by radial transport during the TQ in mid-sized tokamaks. 12 After the TQ, the resulting cold (T e % 5 eV) current quench (CQ) plasma is thought to heal stochastic regions rapidly (on a 0.1 ms timescale), resulting in greatly reduced radial loss of hot electrons during the CQ, although this belief is based entirely on simulations. 8,9 There is experimental evidence that MHD modes or turbulence can cause loss of REs during the CQ, 13 but this loss term has not been quantified and is typically ignored.…”
“…Throughout the simulations performed, the preinjection on-axis electron temperature is varied between 4 and 20 keV, as SPI experiments in DIII-D suggest a growing seed runaway population as the electron temperature increases (Paz-Soldan et al. 2020). The simulation results obtained are compared against measurements of AUG disruption experiments.…”
The formation of a substantial postdisruption runaway electron current in ASDEX Upgrade material injection experiments is determined by avalanche multiplication of a small seed population of runaway electrons. For the investigation of these scenarios, the runaway electron description of the coupled 1.5-D transport solvers ASTRA-STRAHL is amended by a fluid model describing electron runaway caused by the hot-tail mechanism. Applied in simulations of combined background plasma evolution, material injection and runaway electron generation in ASDEX Upgrade discharge #33108, both the Dreicer and hot-tail mechanism for electron runaway produce only
${\sim }$
3 kA of runaway current. In colder plasmas with core electron temperatures
$T_\textrm {e,c}$
below 9 keV, the postdisruption runaway current is predicted to be insensitive to the initial temperature, in agreement with experimental observations. Yet in hotter plasmas with
$T_\textrm {e,c}$
above 10 keV, hot-tail runaway can be increased by up to an order of magnitude, contributing considerably to the total postdisruption runaway current. In ASDEX Upgrade high-temperature runaway experiments, however, no runaway current is observed at the end of the disruption, despite favourable conditions for both primary and secondary runaway.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.