Run Runet Runaway: The Transformation of the Russian Internet as a Cultural-Historical Object

Abstract

The history of Runet is not just a chronological account of the major events in the Russian Internet space. We take a historical approach in order to identify the boundaries of Runet as an object of investigation. This chapter offers a framework for the examination of Runet as a constantly changing socio-technical object. Due to the participatory nature of its continuous construction, Runet has been addressed as a “runaway object” (Engeström, 2008). In order to follow the development of this “runaway Runet,” we identify and follow five interrelated vectors: the technological vector, the cultural vector, the media vector, the user vector and the political vector. This allows us not only to describe the history of Runet but also to contribute to an understanding of what it is and whether there is an “end to Runet.”

National markets in a world of global platform giants: The persistence of Russian domestic competitors

“…After Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, and rising conflict in the Donbas, geopolitical tensions rapidly deepened, leading the Russian government to decide it was necessary to mitigate dependence on Western‐based telecommunication industry‐related firms. The Russian authorities introduced an internet governance approach meant to center cyberspace control within the country's borders (Asmolov & Kolozaridi, 2020; Budnitsky, 2020; Stadnik, 2019). In addition to increasing information and infrastructural control over the internet, Russian regulators began to challenge the asymmetric market power between Russian and US platforms (Budnitsky & Jia, 2018).…”

Exploring the ethics of political PR professionals using moral foundations theory

“…On the other hand, that decade was revolutionary because of the transformation of mass media, also called the technological revolution [ 35 – 37 ]. Both international and local Russian mass media became important for Russian social life [ 38 ]. Many of these processes echo the “global village” and “global theater” concepts of [ 39 ], when everybody could be a producer of media content that will be popular among millions of people [ 40 ].…”

Alexei Navalny and Protests in Russia: Growth of Online Activism Under the Authoritarian System

“…Murphy, F. (2017) states that tendencies such as widespread visual political irony, "slacktivism" 1 and horizontal communication structures can be considered inevitable difficulties with modern online communication and fundamental limitations of the internet itself as a political tool. Research on Russian internet as a 'revolutionary space' is conducted by Toepfl (2011), Popkova (2014) Ermoshina & Musiani (2017), Asmolov & Kolozaridi (2021). Furthermore, Lokot (2018)'s paper finds that Russian opposition activists place a high value on digital, media, and security literacy and that navigating the internet using security tools and protocols such as VPN, two-phase authentication, and encrypted messaging is increasingly seen as the default modus operandi for those participating in organized dissent in Russia to mitigate growing state surveillance.…”