Ruminations on the Development and Future of Population Dynamics Models in Fisheries

Abstract

ABSTRACT. I trace the development of fisheries models (i.e., fish population dynamics models of species subject to fisheries) to the 21st century. The first real efforts occurred in the period 1900 1920 with the work of Baranov (the “Grandfather” of fisheries population dynamics) and the formation of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The establishment of the science occurred between 1920 1960 with multi‐species modeling, age‐ and size‐structure dynamics, and production models. Fundamental work during this time was done by Ricker (the “Father” of fisheries population dynamics), Beverton and Holt (the “Prophets” of fisheries population dynamics), Chapman, Dickie, DeLury, Graham, Gulland, Leslie, Lotka and Volterra, Russell, Schaefer, and Thompson. During this time, most of the workwas deterministic and mathematical. Between 1960 and 1980, statistical methodology evolved greatly but was separate from mathematical advances for the most part. The development of statistical principles for the estimation of animal abundance was further enhanced by Arnason, Buckland, Burnham and Anderson and White, Cormack, Eberhardt, Jolly, Manly, Pollock, Ricker, Robson, and Seber, among others. Fisheries models evolved in a deterministic setting, with advances in age‐structured models (Gulland, Pope, Doubleday), surplus production models (Pella, Tomlin‐son, Schnute, Fletcher, Hilborn), growth models, bioeconomic models (C. Clark) and management control models (Hilborn, Walters). The period 1980 2000 was the Golden Age. The integration between mathematics and statistics occurred when likelihood and least squares techniques were formally combined with mathematical models of population change. The number of fisheries modelers grew exponentially during this time, resulting in a concomitant increase in publications. A major advance in the 1990s has been the development of Bayesian and time series methods, which have allowed explicit specification of uncertainty. Currently, theory allows realistic modeling of age‐ and size‐structured populations, migratory populations and harvesting strategies. These models routinely incorporate measurement error, process error (stochasticity) and time variation. But data needs often overwhelm the performance of models, and greater demands are being placed on models to answer complex questions. There has been poor communication between fisheries and ecological modelers, between fisheries researchers and statisticians, and among fisheries researchers in different geographic locales. Future models will need to deal better with habitat and spatial concerns, genetics, multispecies interactions, environmental factors, effects of harvesting on the ecosystem, model misspecification and so‐cioeconomic concerns. Meta‐analysis, retrospective analysis and operating models are some modern approaches for dealing with uncertainty and providing for sustainable fisheries. However, I fear that current attacks on single‐species models and management may result in rejection of these advances an...

A user-friendly tool to assess management plans for European eel fishery and conservation

“…Mathematical models provide effective tools to analyse fishery dynamics and identify trade-offs between conservation and management goals (Quinn, 2003). Unfortunately, developing reliable models requires specific training in mathematics and/or computer science and the availability of long-term datasets: this is particularly critical for small-scale, data-poor fisheries lacking the financial and institutional capacity typical of more lucrative industrial fisheries.…”

Overlooked biological and economic implications of within-season fishery dynamics

“…In this case, the total catch for one season, as shown by Russian scientist Fedor Baranov almost a century ago (Baranov 1918), is F/(F + M ) 1 − e −(F +M ) N 0 , where M and F are natural and fishing mortality rates, respectively, and N 0 is population abundance in the beginning of a season. This equation, often referred to as the Baranov catch equation, is a cornerstone of quantitative fisheries science (Quinn 2003). In economics, the same equation is sometimes known as the Beverton-Holt model (Steinshamn 2011), after Beverton and Holt (1957).…”

Curiosity, Recruitment, and Chaos: A Tribute to Bill Ricker’s Inquiring Mind

“…As a result, the fishery biological system he described has been investigated with increasing depth. Quinn (2003) gives a readable modern perspective, and Schnute (1994Schnute ( , 2003 provides further background on contemporary fishery models. Ricker's foundation lies at the core of all modern work.…”