2019
DOI: 10.1080/09291016.2019.1644019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumen microflora, fermentation pattern and microbial enzyme activity in sheep fed paddy straw based complete feed fortified with probiotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Dahlan (2000) showed that goat fed oil palm fronds produced more ammonia, TVFA, acetic acid, cellulase and xylanase compared to goat fed rice straw, which supports our findings. Sheikh et al (2019) revealed that feed digestibility and microbial activity were improved when degradable protein was added to the diet, which could explain the higher bacterial population and VFA production in S1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Dahlan (2000) showed that goat fed oil palm fronds produced more ammonia, TVFA, acetic acid, cellulase and xylanase compared to goat fed rice straw, which supports our findings. Sheikh et al (2019) revealed that feed digestibility and microbial activity were improved when degradable protein was added to the diet, which could explain the higher bacterial population and VFA production in S1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline in rumen pH under optimum point affects rumen fermentation adversely, especially the cellulose degradation [30] ; consequently, animal performance could be decreased. The concentrate feed mixture consists of rapidly fermentable carbohydrate that encourages the microbial activities and TVFA production that declines the rumen pH; in contrast, the higher dietary fiber has a neutralizing effect on rumen PH [31] , [32] . This explanation supports the low pH, and higher TVFA production in the S1 group fed the common concentrate mixture ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have found no cellulolytic enzyme genes in the genome of the giant panda, which must rely instead on its gut microbes to digest cellulose ( Zhang et al, 2007 ; Li et al, 2010 ; Wei et al, 2019 ). However, it lacks a herbivore-like rumen, in which more than half the carbohydrate-active proteins can degrade cellulose and many still-unknown bacterial species (and candidate genes) participate in the relevant activities ( Hess et al, 2011 ; Neumann and Suen, 2018 ; Sheikh et al, 2019 ). Several microbial strains and GH genes that can degrade cellulose have been identified with high-throughput sequencing and culture in vitro ( Anand et al, 2012 ; Mearls and Lynd, 2014 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Guo W. et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%