2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumen microbial protein flow and plasma amino acid concentrations in early lactation multiparity Holstein cows fed commercial rations, and some relationships with dietary nutrients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the reduction in plasma concentrations of Leu (P=0.01) and the tendency for Tyr concentrations to decrease (P=0.07) with higher CM inclusion in the current study. When compared to the plasma AA indices of Swanepoel et al (2016b), Tyr concentrations for the HCM diet was below 20 th percentile of measured data, suggesting that it could be potentially limiting, which is consistent with previous findings and our objective. However, even with Phe concentrations in the HCM diet below the 20 th percentile, the lack of a reduction in plasma Phe concentrations due to feeding the HCM versus LCM diet suggests that supplementing Phe to the HCM diet in order to regain potentially lost BCS (as suggested in Swanepoel et al, 2016a) was unnecessary.…”
Section: Low CM Versus High Cm Diets Without Phe or Tyr Supplementationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the reduction in plasma concentrations of Leu (P=0.01) and the tendency for Tyr concentrations to decrease (P=0.07) with higher CM inclusion in the current study. When compared to the plasma AA indices of Swanepoel et al (2016b), Tyr concentrations for the HCM diet was below 20 th percentile of measured data, suggesting that it could be potentially limiting, which is consistent with previous findings and our objective. However, even with Phe concentrations in the HCM diet below the 20 th percentile, the lack of a reduction in plasma Phe concentrations due to feeding the HCM versus LCM diet suggests that supplementing Phe to the HCM diet in order to regain potentially lost BCS (as suggested in Swanepoel et al, 2016a) was unnecessary.…”
Section: Low CM Versus High Cm Diets Without Phe or Tyr Supplementationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Phe was supplemented to the HCM diet (HCM+P), both plasma Phe and Tyr concentrations increased, with Phe concentrations approaching the 80 th percentile of its AA index (Swanepoel et al, 2016b), suggesting possible oversupply of these AA. That these plasma AA increases were associated with a reduction of milk protein content and yield, in addition to the already lower milk components for the HCM versus LCM fed cows, and with continued higher PUN concentrations, suggests that many AA were not utilized and therefore catabolized.…”
Section: High CM Diet Versus High Cm Diet With Phe Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey study examining comparisons between milk production, TMR ingredient profiles and plasma AA concentrations within 20 California (USA) dairy farms confirmed that plasma Phe concentrations are negatively correlated to the inclusion level of CM in the ration and that milk yield was negatively correlated with all plasma AA concentrations except Phe (Swanepoel et al, 2015b), supporting the hypothesis that Phe is important relative to milk production. Other studies feeding CM have shown a similar decline in plasma Phe compared to other protein sources (Christen et al, 2010), or a decrease in Phe proportions in metabolizable protein (MP) with higher dietary CM inclusions (Martineau et al, 2014), even though there were no changes in plasma Phe concentrations with different inclusion levels of CM (Mulrooney et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Proteolysis occurs in the form of nucleophile attacks on the peptide bonds, which may be endoproteolytic or exoproteolytic, by proteases, and the process normally occurs on the outside of cells that are intimately associated with the bacterial wall (e.g., adsorption of the proteins in cellulosomes) or occurs freely in other situations, with proteases being excreted into the ruminal medium. Nevertheless, bacteria exist which, depending on their species and strain, the trophic conditions of the moment, their molecular weight and the biochemical characteristics of the polypeptides to be digested, cause intracellular hydrolysis of the polypeptides (Asplund, 1994;Swanepoel et al, 2016). The protozoa typically swallow proteins, microparticles and microorganisms whole (e.g., bacteria, protozoa, and fungi), implying that, in most cases, protein digestion by these microorganisms is intracellular.…”
Section: Complexity Of Proteolysis In the Ruminal Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a methodological point of view, the importance of these phenomena for predicting protein degradability is that these acids and other metabolites can form substrates that promote microbial growth and reproduction, principally for many cellulolytic bacteria and other microorganisms that use these fatty acids as sources of energy and/or carbon chains. Normally, these isoacids, in conjunction with ammonium fixation, allow de novo synthesis of microbial amino acids (Ørskov, 1992;Van Soest, 1994;Chamberlain and Choung, 1995;Bull, 2001;Swanepoel et al, 2016), and the magnitude of the synthesis is mainly regulated by the activity of the enzymes glutamine synthetase, NADP-glutamate dehydrogenase and NAD-alanine dehydrogenase, whose K m values for ammonium fixation are 1.8, 1.8 to 3.1, and 70 mM of ammonium, respectively (Asplund, 1994). It should be noted that the degree of enzyme substrate affinity (K m ) will determine, in some way, the activity levels of these enzymes as a function of the intracellular nitrogen concentration of the microorganisms and the N content in the ruminal medium.…”
Section: Complexity Of Proteolysis In the Ruminal Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%