Rules versus ideas in landscape protection: is a Green Heart attack imminent?

Abstract

Landscape protection in metropolitan areas is an ongoing activity that lies outside the remit of political office-holders. As political agendas change, the importance of landscape protection on strategic planning agendas may also change. This paper raises the question whether this strategic level of landscape protection ought to rest on rules or ideas, and uses the Dutch Green Heart as a case study. The success of Dutch planning has been attributed to a planning doctrine which has evolved around a principle of spatial organization consisting of an open landscape (a Green Heart) in the middle of a 'rim' city -in this case the Dutch Randstad. After this success had been recognized, policies were developed to formalize the protection of the Green Heart in strategic planning rules. Political controversies ensued, which resulted in the abolition of Green Heart policies at national level. Recently, the province of Zuid-Holland adopted a new structural vision and a byelaw in which there is no role for the Green Heart in development control. This paper analyses this new system of strategic development control and discusses the role of rules as opposed to ideas in landscape protection.

Regional governance and public accountability in planning for new housing: A new approach in South Holland, the Netherlands

“…Decades ago, Lefcoe (1977: 198, 260) also indicated similar success-factors for active local land policy: a higher level review of local plans to limit over-building, stronger public monopoly on land supply via coordinated planning decisions and intimate knowledge of regional market and local needs. In the studied case, regional planning encourages these by strengthening facilitative “ideas” rather than repressive “rules” (Korthals Altes, 2017); hierarchical accountability bolsters horizontal accountability, being anchored in the meta-level of market-oriented governance goals.…”

Unsettling the Copenhagen Finger Plan: towards neoliberalization of a planning doctrine?

“…However, as Roodbol-Mekkes et al (2012: 390) point out 'the changes have not made the spatial planning doctrine stronger'. The weakening of the planning doctrine eventually led to the abandonment of the Green Heart doctrine in Dutch national spatial policies in 2011 (Korthals Altes, 2018).…”