2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(02)00617-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rule interpreter: a chemical language for structure-based screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was restricted to 463 polar and non-polar narcotics taken from the recommended 694 experimental data for fish proposed by Meylan since for reactive chemicals the concept of steady state concentration in the test organism is in conflict with their reactive mode of action. The compounds were categorised as non-specifically acting toxicants and toxicants acting by specific mechanisms of action according to a substructure-based rule system for classification of chemicals [27], and the more sophisticated scheme proposed by Schultz et al [28]. The analysis was in agreement with previous models identifying a linear relationship in the range for log K ow 1 -6.…”
Section: Experimental Methods For Bcf Data Generationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The study was restricted to 463 polar and non-polar narcotics taken from the recommended 694 experimental data for fish proposed by Meylan since for reactive chemicals the concept of steady state concentration in the test organism is in conflict with their reactive mode of action. The compounds were categorised as non-specifically acting toxicants and toxicants acting by specific mechanisms of action according to a substructure-based rule system for classification of chemicals [27], and the more sophisticated scheme proposed by Schultz et al [28]. The analysis was in agreement with previous models identifying a linear relationship in the range for log K ow 1 -6.…”
Section: Experimental Methods For Bcf Data Generationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The Molecular Query Language (MQL) provides a feature to annotate user-defined properties 17 ; however, it too requires separate enumeration of resonance structures. Attempts to incorporate physicochemical properties to various dialects of SMILES or SMARTS queries have been also reported 18,19 . Another approach to enrich the query specification with physicochemical properties is illustrated by ChemAxon's CTL 8 , where a two-step process is employed to query with features of extensible chemical terms followed by filtering based on calculated descriptor values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Molecular Query Language (MQL) provides a feature to annotate user-defined properties; however, it too requires separate enumeration of resonance structures. Attempts to incorporate physicochemical properties to various dialects of SMILES or SMARTS queries have been also reported. , Another approach to enrich the query specification with physicochemical properties is illustrated by ChemAxon’s CTL, where a two-step process is employed to query with features of extensible chemical terms followed by filtering based on calculated descriptor values. Although these various extensions and approaches satisfy their intended purposes, they remain proprietary or at least not publicly available, and also incompatible with each other since there have been no large and coordinated efforts to standardize query languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity to the AR was the subject of several SAR/QSAR studies on more or less extended sets of chemicals [2,3,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Most of these models rely on molecular field analyses (CoMFA or similar methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%