2004
DOI: 10.1080/03461230410020310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruin probabilities and investment under interest force in the presence of regularly varying tails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Gaier and Grandits (2003) it shown that, under the assumptions that the claims have regularly varying tail distributions, and that the firm invests a constant fraction of its wealth in the stock market, modeled by geometric Brownian motion, the following holds true…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Gaier and Grandits (2003) it shown that, under the assumptions that the claims have regularly varying tail distributions, and that the firm invests a constant fraction of its wealth in the stock market, modeled by geometric Brownian motion, the following holds true…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Theorem 3.3 states that the risk process with risky investment defined in (3.3) has Markov property. In practice, the aggregate residual assets amount at time t is often given by Y (t) [15,16] ,…”
Section: A(t) {N (T) T ≥ 0} Is a Poisson Process With Intensity A(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first passage problem for this class of processes has been treated extensively, for instance, by Segerdahl (1942), Delbaen and Haezendonck (1987), Garrido (1989), Asmussen and Bladt (1996), Paulsen (1993), Embrechts and Schmidli (1994), Peters (1994), Sundt and Teugels (1995), Gjessing (1997a, 1997b), Dickson and Waters (1999), Norberg (1999), Wang and Wu (2001), Cai and Dickson (2002), Kalashnikov & Norberg (2002), Göing-Jeaschke & Yor (2003), Novikov (2003), Ma and Sun (2003), Wang (2004, 2005), Cai (2004), Cai & Yang (2005), Gaier & Grandits (2004), Paulsen, Kasozi & Steigen (2005) and Gerber & Yang (2007). However, despite of the common previous use of the constant volatility per unit rule, k(U t ) = s r , this assumption may not be regarded as totally realistic in many rational investments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%