2018
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2018119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruelle's inequality in negative curvature

Abstract: In this paper we study different notions of entropy for measurepreserving dynamical systems defined on noncompact spaces. We see that some classical results for compact spaces remain partially valid in this setting. We define a new kind of entropy for dynamical systems defined on noncompact Riemannian manifolds, which satisfies similar properties to the classical ones. As an application, we prove Ruelle's inequality and Pesin's entropy formula for the geodesic flow in manifolds with pinched negative sectional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus F su is Hölder continuous and the Liouville measure on T 1 M is the equilibrium state for F su . The existence with an assumption on the pressure of F su is proved in Chapter 7 of [27] and [32] proves that the assumption is true in our case. The measure class determined by the Patterson-Sullivan density is called the Lebesgue class.…”
Section: Brownian Motionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Thus F su is Hölder continuous and the Liouville measure on T 1 M is the equilibrium state for F su . The existence with an assumption on the pressure of F su is proved in Chapter 7 of [27] and [32] proves that the assumption is true in our case. The measure class determined by the Patterson-Sullivan density is called the Lebesgue class.…”
Section: Brownian Motionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Remark 2.1. It follows from Theorem 2.10 in [19] that if X is a complete (non-compact) Riemannian manifold and µ ∈ M e (f ), then (15) is also valid.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, if µ ∈ M e (f ), it follows from Lemma 2.8 in [19] that h µ (f, x) = µ-ess inf h µ (T, y) is valid for µ-a.e. x, and then, by Theorem 2.9 in [19], that h µ (f, x) ≥ h µ (T ) is also valid for µ-a.e.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One also has, by Lemma 2.8 in [32], that h µ (T, x)dµ(x) = µ-ess inf h µ (T, x), and then, by Theorem 2.9 in [32], that h µ (T, x)dµ(x) ≥ h µ (T ). Thus, by inequality (7), one gets for µ-a.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%