2017
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2017.12002274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubrics as a Foundation for Assessing Student Competencies: One Public Administration Program’s Creative Exercise

Abstract: Since implementation of the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA) standards for accreditation in 2009, public administration programs have been developing programmatic competencies that reflect NASPAA's universal standards. Likewise, myriad efforts have analyzed data related to student and program progress toward achievement of these competencies. This article adds to that conversation by recounting the approach to assessing competencies used in the Department of Public Admi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasilnya digunakan untuk melihat kemajuan belajar terkait tujuan pembelajaran (Wilsey, Kloser, Borko, & Rafanelli, 2020), serta tolak ukur keberhasilan penyelenggaraaan pendidikan (Sandberg & Kecskes, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Hasilnya digunakan untuk melihat kemajuan belajar terkait tujuan pembelajaran (Wilsey, Kloser, Borko, & Rafanelli, 2020), serta tolak ukur keberhasilan penyelenggaraaan pendidikan (Sandberg & Kecskes, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Competency maps were developed to demonstrate participants' developmental process (adapted from the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition 7 ) that offered a visual illustration of gains in knowledge, expertise, and application in practice (FIGURE 1). 23 Participants selfassessed their competency progress using the maps at 3 points: baseline, mid-program, and completion. Assessments were scored on a 9-point scale, with 1 rated as novice with little awareness of the competency and 9 reflecting mastery capable of evaluation and improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%