2010
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubella metapopulation dynamics and importance of spatial coupling to the risk of congenital rubella syndrome in Peru

Abstract: Rubella is generally a mild childhood disease, but infection during early pregnancy may cause spontaneous abortion or congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), which may entail a variety of birth defects. Consequently, understanding the age-structured dynamics of this infection has considerable public health value. Vaccination short of the threshold for local elimination of transmission will increase the average age of infection. Accordingly, the classic concern for this infection is the potential for vaccination to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 A and B and Figs. S1 and S2) (15,(22)(23)(24)(25). Similar patterns have been reported in other countries in East Africa, suggesting regional consistency (26).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 A and B and Figs. S1 and S2) (15,(22)(23)(24)(25). Similar patterns have been reported in other countries in East Africa, suggesting regional consistency (26).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…To infer the unknown parameters (β s , I 0 and S 0 , and m) we can link this to data by the relationship I ðrÞ T = BinomialðI t + I t+1 , ρÞ, where ρ is the reporting rate and I ðrÞ T is the reported number of infected cases at a monthly time scale; the sum is taken over the previous 2 wk. We have previously found that low reporting rates result in strongly downward biased estimates of m, which result in unrealistic dynamics (15); this also proved to be the case here. For this analysis, we therefore fixed m at a consensus value of 0.97.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations