2007
DOI: 10.5580/2749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubella Immune Status of Pregnant & Non-pregnant women in Indian Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, these findings are similar to findings from other previous studies [13][14][15][16]39,40]. This study found a decreasing prevalence after the age of 39 years, and this may result from waning immunity [46], which is commonly seen following childhood vaccination with MMR vaccine, but has also been reported to develop in women who developed immunity as a result of infection with the wild virus during childhood [46,47]. This group of women have increased risks of re-infection during pregnancy with consequent transmission of the virus to their fetuses, and a CRS rate of up to 8% [48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, these findings are similar to findings from other previous studies [13][14][15][16]39,40]. This study found a decreasing prevalence after the age of 39 years, and this may result from waning immunity [46], which is commonly seen following childhood vaccination with MMR vaccine, but has also been reported to develop in women who developed immunity as a result of infection with the wild virus during childhood [46,47]. This group of women have increased risks of re-infection during pregnancy with consequent transmission of the virus to their fetuses, and a CRS rate of up to 8% [48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These titers are lower than that reported by Adewumi et al from Ibadan, where a median titer of 165U/mL was found with a range of <10-250U/mL [39]. The titers in this study are also lower than that reported by Kaushal et al in an Indian population, where serum IgG titers were above 200U/ml in 11.11% of the study population [42]. Nevertheless, the finding in this study shows that 98.1% of the pregnant women studied had moderate to strong protection against re-infection with the wild type rubella virus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of 646 participants enrolled during the study period, a total of 502 pregnant women had a second-trimester serum samples available for testing. The mean maternal age was 29.7 years (range 17-44 years, SD 6.3), with a median of 29.5 (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Women in the 17-24 and 25-34 years age groups accounted for 23.1% and 52.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Previous studies showing this relationship may have resulted from false positive tests due to cross-reacting specific IgG produced following infection with other non-common viruses, such as Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstain Barr Virus (EBV), and human parvovirus B19. [38][39][40][41][42] Generally, when infection with rubella is clinically suspected, laboratory tests should include those for the CMV, EBV, herpes simplex virus (HSV), toxoplasmosis, syphilis and Zika virus. [15,47] One of the children (16.7%) tested negative for both IgG and IgM rubella antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%