2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jarm.0000047316.02424.7c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubbish, Relatives, and Residence: The Family Use of Middens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A few activities, such as winnowing rice in a basket to remove the chaff, produce so much debris that they may be conducted over a midden. Most middens receive trash from more than one household (Beck and Hill, 2004).…”
Section: Natural Habitation and Midden Contexts In Dalupamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few activities, such as winnowing rice in a basket to remove the chaff, produce so much debris that they may be conducted over a midden. Most middens receive trash from more than one household (Beck and Hill, 2004).…”
Section: Natural Habitation and Midden Contexts In Dalupamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This location has been used as an area of refuse disposal by domestic groups that inhabit that section of the village (houses 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) for the past 10 years at least. Among the Asurini, the middens' use and localization are frequently related to the distribution of domestic groups within the village, an aspect that has already been observed in other contexts (Beck 2006;Beck and Hill 2004). Regarding the pits, it can be perceived that they are not regularly used in the village and, frequently, they are used by the domestic groups, as a rule, to deposit inorganic vestiges that do not deteriorate easily (e.g., cans, glass, plastic).…”
Section: Relationship Between Discard and The Spatial And Relational mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ethnoarchaeological studies have tended to support such assumptions (Deal 1985;Hayden and Cannon 1983). Beck (2006) and Beck and Hill (2004) have recently documented that, in the Philippines, sherds deposited in middens were representative of overall composition of vessels in use. In Costa Rica, residents of a single isolated household transported their trash at least 10 m to dump it into a drainage ditch (Lange and Rydberg 1972:427-428).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger than expected mean size of the sherds and daub fragments may indicate that the construction fill used to build Mound 3 was collected early in the Conchas phase, and that midden and other materials were relatively quickly amassed and redeposited as fill. Alternatively, this pattern may be explained by the observations of Beck (2006) and Beck and Hill (2004) that burying trash provides protection from mechanical attrition.…”
Section: Mean Size Of Ceramic Sherds and Daub From Five Conchas-phasementioning
confidence: 99%