2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 nano-aggregated Nafion membrane modified electrode for simultaneous electrochemical detection of hypoxanthine, xanthine and uric acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 9A, the highest current peak value was obtained at pH 7.0, which is consistent with the previous literature [32]. Hence, pH 7.0 was selected as the optimum level for determining Xa.…”
Section: The Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As shown in Fig. 9A, the highest current peak value was obtained at pH 7.0, which is consistent with the previous literature [32]. Hence, pH 7.0 was selected as the optimum level for determining Xa.…”
Section: The Effect Of Phsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Their concentration levels are sensitive indicators of certain diseases, including perinatal asphyxia, cerebral ischemia, hyperuricemia, gout CONTACT Junwei Yang yangjw@sdju.edu.cn [6][7][8], and positive effect on cardiovascular system [9][10][11][12][13]. Therefore, the accurate measurement of HX, XA, and UA is very important in food, biochemical, and clinical diagnosis [14][15][16][17][18]. Various techniques have been developed for the simultaneous determination of HX, XA, and UA, such as enzymatic methods [19][20][21], as well as a highperformance liquid chromatographic method [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration levels of Xa and HXa in body fluids are sensitive indexes for the pathology conditions of gout, hyperuricemia and renal failure. [1][2] Therefore, simultaneous detection of these two compounds have considerable significance in biochemical and clinical diagnosis. Various methods have been reported to determine the purine degradation products, including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 3 photoion mass spectroscopy, 4 chemiluminescence, 5 enzymatic method, [6][7] capillary electrophoresis (CE) 8 and electrochemistry, 2,9-13 whereas HPLC methods require fastidious sample preparations, prolonged analysis time and expensive materials, enzymatic methods are unstable and very expensive, and CE methods need expensive apparatus, only electrochemical approaches are relatively easy and fast for determination of Xa and HXa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%