2009
DOI: 10.17487/rfc5691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RTP Payload Format for Elementary Streams with MPEG Surround Multi-Channel Audio

Abstract: This memo describes extensions for the RTP payload format defined in RFC 3640 for the transport of MPEG Surround multi-channel audio. Additional Media Type parameters are defined to signal backwardscompatible transmission inside an MPEG-4 Audio elementary stream. In addition, a layered transmission scheme that doesn't use the MPEG-4 systems framework is presented to transport an MPEG Surround elementary stream via RTP in parallel with an RTP stream containing the downmixed audio data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a layered encoding is used, where the media data is split across several RTP flows, then it is often necessary to exactly synchronise the RTP flows comprising the different layers before layers other than the base layer can be decoded. Examples of such layered encodings are H.264 SVC in NI-T mode [AVT-RTP-SVC] and MPEG surround multi-channel audio [RFC5691]. As described in Section 2, such synchronisation is possible in RTP, but can be difficult to perform rapidly.…”
Section: Application To Decoding Order Recovery In Layered Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a layered encoding is used, where the media data is split across several RTP flows, then it is often necessary to exactly synchronise the RTP flows comprising the different layers before layers other than the base layer can be decoded. Examples of such layered encodings are H.264 SVC in NI-T mode [AVT-RTP-SVC] and MPEG surround multi-channel audio [RFC5691]. As described in Section 2, such synchronisation is possible in RTP, but can be difficult to perform rapidly.…”
Section: Application To Decoding Order Recovery In Layered Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%