2018
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1538792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

rTMS for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: where should we be stimulating?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the studies included in this analysis compared the outcomes associated with stimulation at different sites. Considering the different neurodegenerative and cognitive impairment characteristics of MCI and AD, the ideal location for rTMS stimulation remains unclear (Heath et al, 2018 ). Studies with larger sample sizes are required to determine the best stimulation targets for rTMS that yield optimal cognition improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the studies included in this analysis compared the outcomes associated with stimulation at different sites. Considering the different neurodegenerative and cognitive impairment characteristics of MCI and AD, the ideal location for rTMS stimulation remains unclear (Heath et al, 2018 ). Studies with larger sample sizes are required to determine the best stimulation targets for rTMS that yield optimal cognition improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, starting from the idea that it induces a gradual readjustment of an intact but “functionally” reduced area due to a steady reduction in synaptic strength, every effort that aims at improving cognition must consider the level of cognitive efficacy and neural activity of the stimulated network. Therefore, NIBS potential should be exploited before the significant neuronal loss has occurred [ 89 ], with a well-characterized sample, a precise definition of the stimulation dose based on individual anatomy [ 90 , 91 ]), and adopting a single-subject approach [ 92 , 93 ]). In addition to this point, the role of individual features, such as demographics (e.g., [ 56 ]) and biological variables [ 70 ], in modulating NIBS efficacy is yet to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though up to date no specific area has been identified as ideal to provide the most beneficial effects, it is suggested that several areas or pathways that are known to be negatively affected in AD, could provide potential targets. On that basis, by targeting these areas, crucial for normal cognitive function brain connections and pathways could be strengthened or rescued (e.g., stimulating the precuneus to alleviate abnormal functional connectivity in the default mode network) leading to cognitive improvements ( Heath et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Gamma Frequency Non-invasive Brain Stimulation In Alzheimer’s Disease Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%