2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RTM using effective boundary saving: A staggered grid GPU implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). 따라서 GPU를 사용한 거꿀 참 반사 보 정이나 완전 파형 역산의 경우 알고리즘을 수정하여 계산량을 늘리는 대신 메모리 복사를 없애는 연구들도 진행되고 있다 (Yang et al, 2014(Yang et al, , 2015. …”
Section: 실험 구성unclassified
“…4). 따라서 GPU를 사용한 거꿀 참 반사 보 정이나 완전 파형 역산의 경우 알고리즘을 수정하여 계산량을 늘리는 대신 메모리 복사를 없애는 연구들도 진행되고 있다 (Yang et al, 2014(Yang et al, , 2015. …”
Section: 실험 구성unclassified
“…One key problem of GPU-based implementations of FWI is that the computation is always much faster than the data transfer between the host and device. Many researchers choose to reconstruct the source wavefield instead of storing the modeling time history on the disk, just saving the boundaries (Dussaud et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2014). For 2N -th order finite difference, regular grid scheme needs to save N points on each side (Dussaud et al, 2008), while staggered-grid scheme required at least 2N − 1 points on each side (Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Wavefield Reconstruction Via Boundary Savingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in computing capability and hardware makes FWI a popular research subject to improve velocity models. As a booming technology, graphics processing unit (GPU) has been widely used to mitigate the computational drawbacks in seismic imaging (Micikevicius, 2009;Yang et al, 2014) and inversion (Boonyasiriwat et al, 2010;Shin et al, 2014), due to its potential gain in performance. One key problem for GPU implementation is that the parallel computation is much faster while the data communication between host and device always takes longer time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a huge 3D problem, we need a large number of computational resources to save forward and backward wavefields on every grid point and at every time step. To reduce computational cost, the excitation approach (Kalita and Alkhalifah ; Oh, Kalita and Alkhalifah ) and the boundary‐saving method were suggested, in which we only store the forward wavefields at the model boundary and then we reconstruct the full forward wavefields by back propagating the boundary values (Mitter ; Yang, Gao and Wang ). This approach provided reasonable FWI results for a large‐scale 3D elastic problem (Raknes and Arntsen ; Raknes and Weibull ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%