2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RT-LAMP CRISPR-Cas12/13-Based SARS-CoV-2 Detection Methods

Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has attracted public attention. The gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19 is reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, RT-qPCR can only be performed in centralized laboratories due to the requirement for advanced laboratory equipment and qualified workers. In the last decade, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a broad range of combination possibilities of LAMP with downstream analytical systems for the detection of amplification products. They include standard gel electrophoresis 17 and quantitative amplification (qLAMP) 18 over different colorimetric reagents (phenol red 19 , leuco crystal violet 20 , SYBR green 21 , malachite green 22 ) to lateral flow assays (LFA) 23 or combinations with CRISPR-Cas Systems 24 . The most commonly used are LFA and colorimetric assays but the major limitation of the mentioned techniques is that they are not suitable for the distinction of false positive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a broad range of combination possibilities of LAMP with downstream analytical systems for the detection of amplification products. They include standard gel electrophoresis 17 and quantitative amplification (qLAMP) 18 over different colorimetric reagents (phenol red 19 , leuco crystal violet 20 , SYBR green 21 , malachite green 22 ) to lateral flow assays (LFA) 23 or combinations with CRISPR-Cas Systems 24 . The most commonly used are LFA and colorimetric assays but the major limitation of the mentioned techniques is that they are not suitable for the distinction of false positive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID‐19 pandemic has pushed researchers to develop innovative approaches for on‐field virus detection to contain the virus spread effectively. Therefore, since the inception of the COVID‐19 pandemic, many groups have reported development of accurate, easy to use and field‐deployable diagnostic assays for SARS‐CoV‐2 based on CRISPR system (Javalkote et al, 2020; Selvam et al, 2021). Many reports improvised or added some novel aspect to the previously published CRISPR‐based diagnostics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, qPCR needs expensive equipment and skilled workers [21]. Recently, CRISPR-Cas12 mediated trans-collateral activity was widely applied to nucleic acid detection [11,22,23]. The CRISPR-Cas12 detection system is accurate and specific, and it can also combine various readout and amplification technologies [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%