2015
DOI: 10.1002/mana.201300132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rs-bounded H∞-calculus for sectorial operators via generalized Gaussian estimates

Abstract: We show that, for negative generators of analytic semigroups, a bounded H∞‐calculus self‐improves to an Rs‐bounded H∞‐calculus in an appropriate scale of Lp‐spaces if the semigroup satisfies suitable generalized Gaussian estimates. As application of our result we obtain that large classes of differential operators have an Rs‐bounded H∞‐calculus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the dual estimate due to self-adjointness of the semigroup, the generalised Gaussian estimates (2.5) imply the hypotheses of [KuUl,Theorem 2.3]. Then [KuUl,Theorem 2.3]…”
Section: Corollary 43 1 Let the Assumptions Of Theorem 42 Be Satisfie...mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and the dual estimate due to self-adjointness of the semigroup, the generalised Gaussian estimates (2.5) imply the hypotheses of [KuUl,Theorem 2.3]. Then [KuUl,Theorem 2.3]…”
Section: Corollary 43 1 Let the Assumptions Of Theorem 42 Be Satisfie...mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Consequently, A has a H β 2 calculus on L p (R d ; L s (Ω ′ )) for any p 0 < p, s < p ′ 0 and β as in (5.2). We refer to [Bl,Section 2], [KuUl,Section 3] and the references therein for detailed explanations of the two preceding paragraphs and more examples.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the dual estimate due to self-adjointness of the semigroup, the generalized Gaussian estimates (2.5) imply the hypotheses of [KuUl,Theorem 2.3]. Then [KuUl,Theorem 2.3] implies that A has an R s -bounded H ∞ ( ω ) calculus on L p ( ) for s, p ∈ (p 0 , p ′ 0 ) and ω > 0, R s boundedness being defined in that article. By [KuUl,Theorem 2.1], A has then a bounded H ∞ ( ω ) calculus on L p ( ;…”
Section: Now Decompose H Into the Sum Of Two Functionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Then [KuUl,Theorem 2.3] implies that A has an R s -bounded H ∞ ( ω ) calculus on L p ( ) for s, p ∈ (p 0 , p ′ 0 ) and ω > 0, R s boundedness being defined in that article. By [KuUl,Theorem 2.1], A has then a bounded H ∞ ( ω ) calculus on L p ( ;…”
Section: Now Decompose H Into the Sum Of Two Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation