2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RRT-based nonholonomic motion planning using any-angle path biasing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2. In contrast to [18], where the authors assume that g(x)g(x) T is positive definite, we do not make any assumptions on the system vector fields f and g. In fact, for m < n, this condition is not satisfied for (4). Furthermore, [18] does not consider any input constraints.…”
Section: B Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2. In contrast to [18], where the authors assume that g(x)g(x) T is positive definite, we do not make any assumptions on the system vector fields f and g. In fact, for m < n, this condition is not satisfied for (4). Furthermore, [18] does not consider any input constraints.…”
Section: B Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steer(x i , x j ): it generates a trajectory σ and the set of controls u needed to steer the system from x i to x j . The analytical steer function connects any pair of states and respects the topological property as described in [7,17].…”
Section: B Cliff-rrt*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…random variable. Biasing techniques towards the goal region or promising areas of the configuration space may be used if available [16], [17]. The randomness of the samples set ensures good exploration of the configuration space, but comes at the expense of stochastic results which may strongly vary for each planning query in terms of planning efficiency and path quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%