2022
DOI: 10.1177/13548565221109440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online

Abstract: We describe a novel computational dictionary for the study of right-wing populist conspiracy discourse ( RPC) on the internet, specifically in the context of contemporary German politics. After first presenting our definition of conspiracy discourse and grounding it in antecedent research on mediated rhetoric at the intersection of right-wing populism and conspiracy theory, we proceed by outlining our approach to dictionary construction, relying on a combination of manual and automated methods. We validate our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, an anthropologist on the team carried out detailed qualitative content coding of this corpus, building on some of the key pointers from first level coding done by factcheckers, as the foundation for both our subsequent analyses: thematic analysis and lexical discourse analysis. We adopted theoretically informed inductive thematic coding, employing a bottom-up approach and deriving labels for themes and styles of anti-immigrant extremist speech from our ethnographic research on right-wing nationalist discourse online, supplemented by relevant literature (Aslanidis, 2018;Paasch-Colberg et al, 2021;Puschmann et al, 2022) and dialogues with factcheckers. One of the authors (LN), proficient in both German and English, conducted the coding, identifying themes and styles by examining passages in their original language within the posts and clustering the segments into overarching themes and styles based on their content.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, an anthropologist on the team carried out detailed qualitative content coding of this corpus, building on some of the key pointers from first level coding done by factcheckers, as the foundation for both our subsequent analyses: thematic analysis and lexical discourse analysis. We adopted theoretically informed inductive thematic coding, employing a bottom-up approach and deriving labels for themes and styles of anti-immigrant extremist speech from our ethnographic research on right-wing nationalist discourse online, supplemented by relevant literature (Aslanidis, 2018;Paasch-Colberg et al, 2021;Puschmann et al, 2022) and dialogues with factcheckers. One of the authors (LN), proficient in both German and English, conducted the coding, identifying themes and styles by examining passages in their original language within the posts and clustering the segments into overarching themes and styles based on their content.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an aim to overcome the challenge of a "hate/no-hate dichotomy" (p. 177), they combine qualitative text annotation with "standardized labeling, " "in which hate speech is not directly identified by coders but results from …[a] combination of different characteristics, " which they identify as "negative stereotyping, dehumanizing speech and expression of violence" (p. 172). Similarly, Gründl (2022) and Puschmann et al (2022) have developed automated dictionary-based content analysis approaches to measure official populist communication and right-wing populist conspiracy theories in the German speaking context on social media.…”
Section: Social Media and Anti-immigrant Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Curley et al (2022) use terms from the "Hatebase" lexicon, which provides racist and hate speech terms (p. 6) to identify "actors posting far-right content. " Other dictionaries provide computational actor classification methods, such as the RPC-Lex, a dictionary developed for the study of right-wing populist conspiracy (RPC) content in German-language texts (Puschmann et al, 2022). However, dictionaries require case-specific adaptations and ex tensive validation procedures to ensure that inferences from content to actor characteristics are appropriate.…”
Section: Computational Actor Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the three empirical papers of conspiracy theories and far-right politics is a methodology paper – ‘RPC-Lex: A Dictionary to Measure German Right Wing Populist Conspiracy Discourse Online’. Contextualised in contemporary German politics, Puschmann and colleagues (2022) introduced PRC-Lex, a computational dictionary to study right-wing conspiracy narratives. In the paper, the authors provide a detailed description of their approach to constructing and validating the dictionary and demonstrate its application with online comments related to conspiracy theories from alternative news websites and Facebook.…”
Section: Outline Of Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%