Royal commissions and policy influence

Abstract

Royal commissions are established at the Commonwealth and state levels in Australia to investigate matters of significant public concern. These distinctive entities are highly respected both by government and the community. They are typically expected to produce reports that will have significant impact. Although a large number are created primarily to determine why specific events happened and where accountabilities lie, many are expected to generate findings and recommendations that will lead to policy change. We review common strategies that actors in and around government deploy with the purpose of shaping public policy. This leads to an exploration of the influence strategies deployed by three Australian royal commissions that achieved high levels of policy impact. Lessons are drawn for how future royal commissions might create policy legacies that deliver high public value.

The contribution of domestic and family violence death reviews in Australia: From recommendations to reform?

“…Concerns about the lack of monitoring and implementation of DVDR recommendations are similar to those that have been raised about the quality and effectiveness of recommendations made by other death review bodies, such as coroners (Bugeja, Ibrahim, et al, 2012;Bugeja, Woolford, et al, 2018;Grech, 2004;Moore & Henaghan, 2014;Sutherland, Bugeja, et al, 2014;Sutherland, Studdert, et al, 2016) and child death review teams (Wirtz et al, 2011). They also mirror concerns about the efficacy of public inquiry bodies more broadly (e.g., Buckley & O'Nolan, 2013;Mintrom et al, 2021;Stark, 2019;Stutz, 2008).…”

Australian Politics and Policy junior edition

“…52 Head 2005. 53 Prasser 2006;Mintrom, O'Neill and O'Connor 2021. government promised to establish a federal anti-corruption body during the election campaign, and passed legislation with bipartisan and crossbench support at the end of 2022, adopting many of the key features of state bodies. 55…”

Australian Politics and Policy

“…52 Head 2005. 53 Prasser 2006;Mintrom, O'Neill and O'Connor 2021. government promised to establish a federal anti-corruption body during the election campaign, and passed legislation with bipartisan and crossbench support at the end of 2022, adopting many of the key features of state bodies. 55…”