2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roy–Steiner-equation analysis of pion–nucleon scattering

Abstract: Abstract. Low-energy pion-nucleon scattering is relevant for many areas in nuclear and hadronic physics, ranging from the scalar couplings of the nucleon to the long-range part of two-pion-exchange potentials and three-nucleon forces in Chiral Effective Field Theory. In this talk, we show how the fruitful combination of dispersion-theoretical methods, in particular in the form of Roy-Steiner equations, with modern high-precision data on hadronic atoms allows one to determine the pion-nucleon scattering amplitu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
265
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 494 publications
(771 reference statements)
8
265
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the corresponding factor F V π (q 2 1 )F V π (q 2 2 ) can be moved out of the integrals in (4.13), so that one can simply calculate a reduced amplitude, with the dependence on the pion form factors fully factorized. Further, in the solution of Roy-Steiner equations, a MO representation similar to (4.13) is often required for the low-energy region only, in order to match to some known high-energy input, and to this end a finite matching point is introduced [55,[132][133][134][135]. In case the amplitudes are assumed to vanish above the matching point, it effectively acts as a cutoff both in (4.13) and in the Omnès function.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the corresponding factor F V π (q 2 1 )F V π (q 2 2 ) can be moved out of the integrals in (4.13), so that one can simply calculate a reduced amplitude, with the dependence on the pion form factors fully factorized. Further, in the solution of Roy-Steiner equations, a MO representation similar to (4.13) is often required for the low-energy region only, in order to match to some known high-energy input, and to this end a finite matching point is introduced [55,[132][133][134][135]. In case the amplitudes are assumed to vanish above the matching point, it effectively acts as a cutoff both in (4.13) and in the Omnès function.…”
Section: Jhep04(2017)161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform renormalization using the EOMS scheme such that the power counting violating terms are dealt with properly. The S-and P -wave phase shifts are extracted from the manifestly Lorentz invariant amplitudes and then fitted to the phase shifts obtained from the recent Roy-Steiner (RS) equation analysis of πN scattering [17] such that all involved LECs are determined. Based on the obtained LECs, we predict the D-and F -wave phase shifts and compare them with the results of the George Washington University (GWU) group analysis [45].…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)038mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, none of these groups provide uncertainties of their results. Therefore, we prefer to perform fits to the phase shifts generated by the recent Roy-Steiner-equation analysis (RS) of the πN scattering [17], where both the central values and the errors of results are given by Schenklike or conformal parameterizations. Note that this analysis also includes the most up-todate experimental information on the pion-nucleon scattering lengths.…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its empirical number, deduced from low-energy pion-nucleon data, has for a long time been in the range σ N (45 ± 8) MeV [52]. A recent advanced analysis [53] arrives at a significantly larger value: σ N (59.1 ± 3.5) MeV, while lattice QCD [54] suggests a smaller value, σ N = 38 ± 3(stat.) ± 3(syst.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%