2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rovsing Sign Revisited—Effects of an Erroneous Translation on Medical Teaching and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standardization of technique is essential to ensure reproducibility and consistency in reporting when evaluating the sensitivity or specificity of a bedside sign. To assess the extent of this problem, Prosenz and Hirtler evaluated the accuracy of the description of Rovsing sign in English and German literature [19]. None of the English studies or textbooks evaluated in this study included a correct description of the sign [19].…”
Section: Signs Described In Acute Appendicitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardization of technique is essential to ensure reproducibility and consistency in reporting when evaluating the sensitivity or specificity of a bedside sign. To assess the extent of this problem, Prosenz and Hirtler evaluated the accuracy of the description of Rovsing sign in English and German literature [19]. None of the English studies or textbooks evaluated in this study included a correct description of the sign [19].…”
Section: Signs Described In Acute Appendicitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 (p. 1258) (emphasis added) (Table 1) Clinicians often inaccurately performed this test in clinical practice by only applying pressure in the left lower quadrant. 54,55 It has been described as a way of testing for rebound tenderness by applying pressure in the left lower quadrant and then quickly releasing the hand. 56 There have been several theories to account for the pathogenesis of Rovsing sign.…”
Section: Rovsing Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 (p .1258) Thus, the maneuver generates antiperistaltic movement causing elevated tension due to the accumulation of intestinal gases in the colon, and early sufficient resistance at the ileocecal valve results in pain in the right lower quadrant. 55 Other theories include impingement of the inflamed appendix in the right iliac fossa as a result of rightward movement in the coils of ileum, 54 or apposition and friction of the inflamed appendix caused by pressure and shifting against the parietal peritoneum. 55 Rovsing goes on to explain the significance of the test in the differential diagnosis: It is of great importance in the case of differential diagnosis, in the many cases of acute as well as chronic appendicitis, where intumescence and pain in the right fossa iliac are of unsafe nature, and are characterized by renal pains, ureteral stones, ureteritis, or salpingitis, etc.…”
Section: Rovsing Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, computed tomography (CT), given reported sensitivity and specificity rates of 94% and 95%, respectively, has been shown to help diagnose other pathologic conditions and prevent unnecessary hospitalizations [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Despite the fact that ultrasonography and CT have become more readily available, clinical examination remains the cornerstone of the diagnostic process and should not be neglected [ 17 ].…”
Section: Appendicitismentioning
confidence: 99%