Rovibrational Intensities of the (0003) ← (1000) Dyad Absorption Bands of 12C16O2

Line strengths of 12C16O2: 4550–7000cm−1

“…To facilitate comparisons, the corresponding values from previous studies [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and HITRAN04 [9] are listed; however, we have refitted empirical line strengths from the other studies with the same procedure used here so that comparisons will not be hindered by different choices in the analyses. Often, it is unclear whether S v values are for 100% 12 C 16 O 2 or natural abundance (98.42%), and the assumed value of Q R (296) may be different but not explicitly stated.…”

“…The last column contains either the label of the other study or the percent standard deviation, r 2 %, between the observed and computed strengths for J 0 6 40; the second standard deviation is computed in order to judge the quality of the fit for the stronger transitions. Denoting S c as the computed strength and S obs as the observed, r% in general is, [25]; SV(90) Suarez and Valero [26]; VSB(79) Valero et al [27]; VSB(80) Valero et al [28]; HS(00) Henningsen and Simonsen [29]; KGC(00) Kshirsagar et al [30]; THP(71) Toth et al [31]; GBCF(03) Giver et al [32]; VS(78) Valero and Suarez [33]; HYFAW(05) Hikida et al [34]; DH(73) Downing and Hunt [35]; JLTDAB(93) Johns et al [36]; RZPGTHD(06) Regalia-Jarlot et al [37]; BMDPG(06) Boudjaadar et al [38]; BMDPGRTV(06) Boudjaadar et al [39]. a Band center in cm À1 from [7].…”

“…24 11.04(5) 24 29 8.00(3) 1.500 (9) 295.5(5) N 1.00000112(2) 0.2(1) 700 700 700 132. 30 16.0(1) 1.500 (9) 295.5(5) N 1.00000112(2) 0.2(1) 700 700 700 106. 12 58.23 (9) 73.0(1) 297.3(2) N 0.99999983 (10) 0.53(3) 500 500 500 106.…”