2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780367260569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That Hungarian Premier Viktor Orbán, in his 2014 speech in Băile Tuşnad (an ethnic Hungarian enclave in the heart of Romania), propagated the agenda of building an "illiberal state" within the European Union is not likely to advance the category's academic career. 36 With a number of recent publications, notably the weighty Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism 37 and the Journal of Illiberalism Studies, 38 the discourse on illiberalism can be expected to gain momentum, but will also have to deal with a dazzling multiplicity of classifications and readings.…”
Section: Illiberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That Hungarian Premier Viktor Orbán, in his 2014 speech in Băile Tuşnad (an ethnic Hungarian enclave in the heart of Romania), propagated the agenda of building an "illiberal state" within the European Union is not likely to advance the category's academic career. 36 With a number of recent publications, notably the weighty Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism 37 and the Journal of Illiberalism Studies, 38 the discourse on illiberalism can be expected to gain momentum, but will also have to deal with a dazzling multiplicity of classifications and readings.…”
Section: Illiberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… On ‘illiberalism’ and its genealogy, see Sajó et al (2021) and Laruelle (2022). The term ‘illiberal democracy’ has been rationalised and praised (Pappas, 2019) as well as criticised (Müller, 2016) within the adjacent study of populism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authoritarian models of democracy have a long history and a likely future. 4 It is fine to defend a substantively liberal conception of democracy provided you do not pretend that it is the only canonical possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%