Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2017.th4f.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing and Regenerator Planning in a Carrier’s Core ROADM Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we present the simulation results for the proposed regenerator allocation heuristic and compare it with previous algorithms [1,2]. The continental US topology (CONUS) with 75 nodes and 99 bidirectional links is studied.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we present the simulation results for the proposed regenerator allocation heuristic and compare it with previous algorithms [1,2]. The continental US topology (CONUS) with 75 nodes and 99 bidirectional links is studied.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the BP performances of the rankings computed by the proposed and RR methods, respectively. The second benchmark is the greedy constrained-routing regenerator location heuristic (greedy-CRLP) [2] that minimizes the number of RSs subject to the shortest distance routing constraint. The greedy-CRLP algorithm takes the TR value as input and outputs a set of RSs.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advent of colorless directionless reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers (CD-ROADMs) and software-defined optical networking can support dynamic control, management, and optimization of flexible-grid networks 1 , where sparse regenerator sites can be predeployed to enable fast provisioning of services and reconfigurations 2 . To allocate regenerator site (RS) conservatively and effectively, it is necessary to accurately estimate the physical layer impairments (PLIs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%