Routinely collected patient data in neurology research: a systematic mapping review

Abstract

Background This review focuses on neurology research which uses routinely collected data. The number of such studies is growing alongside the expansion of data collection. We aim to gain a broad picture of the scope of how routine healthcare data have been utilised. Methods This study follows a systematic mapping review approach which does not make a judgement on the quality of the papers included in the review, thereby enabling a complete overview of the field. Results Of 4481 publications retrieved, 386 met the eligibility criteria for this study. These publications covered a wide range of conditions, but the majority were based on one or only a small number of neurological conditions. In particular, publications concerned with three discrete areas of neurological practice - multiple sclerosis (MS), epilepsy/seizure and Parkinson’s disease - accounted for 60% of the total. MS was the focus of the highest proportion of eligible studies (35%), yet in the recent Global Burden of Neurological Disease study it ranks only 14th out of 15 neurological disorders for DALY rates. In contrast, migraine is the neurological disorder with the highest ranking of DALYs globally (after stroke) and yet it was represented by only 4% of eligible studies. Conclusion This review shows that there is a disproportionately large body of literature pertaining to relatively rare disorders, and a correspondingly small body of literature describing more common conditions. Therefore, there is potential for future research to redress this balance.

Community prevalence and dyad disease pattern of multimorbidity in China and India: a systematic review

“…In our review, only three studies used routinely collected data, with large sample size, to conduct multimorbidity assessment, spanning ages 18 to >65 years. Despite routinely collected data, such as health insurance claims or electronic health records, been applied in many aspects,96 97 its use in multimorbidity assessment remains limited. This may be due to the concerns about the accessibility, accuracy and reliability of the routinely collected data 98.…”

Design and methodological characteristics of studies using observational routinely collected health data for investigating the link between cancer and neurodegenerative diseases: protocol for a meta-research study

“…Health services generate large amounts of routine health data (so-called ‘real world data’, such as administrative databases, disease registries and electronic health records), which have important secondary uses for research and evaluation. Increases in the availability of routine health data, and the ability to store, process, link, access and analyse large amounts of data represent a major opportunity for conducting studies on the possible relationships between complex (serious) diseases and other health events with abundant collected data 30–34. Using such high-scale data sources often involves challenges for research design, conduct and reporting of studies;35 36 for example, the description of databases’ characteristics, record linkage methodology and any validation of the codes or algorithms used to select the study population.…”