2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine spinal navigation for thoraco–lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm three-dimensional imaging system improves placement accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In CAOS, a real-time navigation system can be applied as a definitive tool to determine the final bone position in the absence of positioning guides, or act as an additional instrument to guide the osteotomies and check the bone movement. The real-time navigation system has been applied currently in various surgical specialties such as spinal surgery, 40 …”
Section: Design and Preparation Of Intraoperative Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CAOS, a real-time navigation system can be applied as a definitive tool to determine the final bone position in the absence of positioning guides, or act as an additional instrument to guide the osteotomies and check the bone movement. The real-time navigation system has been applied currently in various surgical specialties such as spinal surgery, 40 …”
Section: Design and Preparation Of Intraoperative Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Examples of these techniques include the use of anatomic landmarks, 7 laminotomy for palpation of the pedicle, plain radiography, fluoroscopic imaging (standard or image guidance), 8,9 and CT image guidance. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Extensive literature has been published describing the technique, benefits, and drawbacks of each method, as well as comparisons between different approaches. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] With its increasing use has come a multitude of studies regarding the safety of this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability can also be explained by the free-hand method's reliance on surgeon technique preferences, not producing easily reproducible parameters for other surgeons 1 . In contrast to the free-hand method, studies illustrating the used of image-guided techniques have reported an accuracy range of 91.5% to 97.7%, overall much higher than the average accuracies reported for the free-hand technique 3,9,15,17,18,22,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%