1985
DOI: 10.1136/ard.44.6.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine quantification of rheumatoid factor by rate nephelometry.

Abstract: SUMMARYIn a cross-sectional study of over 3000 consecutive serum specimens the levels of rheumatoid factor (RF) measured by rate nephelometry (Beckman ICS II) were compared with values obtained by the more traditional methods of sheep cell agglutination (Rose-Waaler) and latex agglutination. Similar values for sensitivity and specificity were found for all three methods for rheumatoid arthritis, with nephelometry giving slightly higher levels of sensitivity for other rheumatic disorders. A significant correlat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is often an obvious discrepancy between quantitative results from RF measurements performed with different methods. Already one of the first studies on RF measured with nephelometry noted only a modest correlation between agglutination test titers and nephelometry (r=0.46) after excluding seronegative patients (19). Comparisons between nephelometry and turbidometry have also showed significant differences, especially in the low positive range (76), and even different IgM RF immunoassays have shown clear discrepancies depending on whether the target antigen source was human or rabbit IgG (77).…”
Section: Variability Between Methods To Measure Rf and Acpamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is often an obvious discrepancy between quantitative results from RF measurements performed with different methods. Already one of the first studies on RF measured with nephelometry noted only a modest correlation between agglutination test titers and nephelometry (r=0.46) after excluding seronegative patients (19). Comparisons between nephelometry and turbidometry have also showed significant differences, especially in the low positive range (76), and even different IgM RF immunoassays have shown clear discrepancies depending on whether the target antigen source was human or rabbit IgG (77).…”
Section: Variability Between Methods To Measure Rf and Acpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tests appeared based on the agglutination of latex-containing particles of uniform size instead of sheep red blood cells (18). Large scale automation was made possible with the development of nephelometric (19,20) and turbidimetric (21) techniques. Until then, all methods had been isotype-nonspecific, although they all, due to assay format, mainly detected IgM RF.…”
Section: Laboratory Perspectives Autoantibodies In Diagnostic and Classification Criteria For Rheumatoid Arthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serologic studies were performed in a variety of laboratories, including referring clinics/ hospitals and at the study hospital, using standard techniques (23,24). All laboratory tests were ordered as part of clinical evaluation and not performed for the purposes of this study.…”
Section: Clinical and Radiographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF was assayed by nephelometry (turbidimetry) and reported as IU/ml using a particle-enhanced immunoassay with latex-bound heat inactivated IgG, which was bound by RF antibodies in patient serum to form antigen-antibody complexes. The resulting agglutination reaction was read on a Siemens Advia 1200 System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA) using methods previously reported in detail ( 25 , 26 ). Values <15 IU/ml were considered to be normal (negative) for RF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%