1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Does Not Reduce Morbidity and Mortality of Elective Vascular Surgery

Abstract: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
93
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different prospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of invasive monitoring of the pulmonary artery in high risk surgical patients [150][151][152] . There were no differences among the patients who received therapy guided by parameters offered by the pulmonary artery catheter and the patients with a clinical follow-up.…”
Section: Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different prospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of invasive monitoring of the pulmonary artery in high risk surgical patients [150][151][152] . There were no differences among the patients who received therapy guided by parameters offered by the pulmonary artery catheter and the patients with a clinical follow-up.…”
Section: Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In two other small RCTs of patients undergoing elective vascular surgery (some undergoing AAR) the PAC was used to guide therapy aimed at "optimizing" oxygen delivery. 8,9 These studies also showed no improvement in outcome associated with the PAC. Cardiovascular anesthesiologists may also have been swayed by the results of uncontrolled, observational studies in which PAC use has been associated with increased mortality and resource utilization in various patient populations including those with complicated myocardial infarction, 10 critical illness, 1 1 or undergoing noncardiac surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, its routine use is often precluded in trauma patients because it is technically cumbersome to insert and is associated with its own complications, including arrhythmias, perforation, and pericardial tamponade (41) . The PAC has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes and has fallen out of favor for routine use in most noncardiac intensive care situations (42) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%