Routine pre-operative Covid testing in elective surgeries: Is it worth it?

Liu, Jessica K; Porras, Paula A.; Hari, Danielle M.; Chen, Kathryn T.

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.035

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, almost all of the included patients had received at least two doses of the vaccine, which is known to be associated with a reduced number of new COVID-19 cases [16]. However, asymptomatic carriers can still transmit SARS-CoV-2, which is a major impetus for continuing universal pre-procedural testing [17].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Point-of-Care Testing for SARS-CoV-2: A Prospective Study in a Primary Health Centre

Daniels¹,

Cottin

Khanafer

2023

Diagnostics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In 2020, health systems across the world responded to the COVID-19 pandemic by making rapid changes to reduce the risk of exposure in patients and healthcare professionals. The use of point-of-care tests (POCT) has been a central strategy in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of POCT strategy (1) on maintaining elective surgeries by removing the risk of delayed pre-appointment testing and turn-around times and (2) on time dedicated for end-to-end appointment and management, and (3) to assess the feasibility of using the ID NOW® among healthcare professionals and patients in a primary care setting, requiring pre-surgical appointment and minor ENT surgery in the Townsend House Medical Centre (THMC), Devon, United Kingdom. Methods: A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the risk of canceled or delayed surgeries and medical appointments. Second, a multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to calculate changes in the time dedicated to administrative tasks. A questionnaire was developed to assess the acceptance of POCT in patients and staff. Results: 274 patients were included in this study; 174 (63.5%) in Group 1 (Usual Care) and 100 (36.5%) in Group 2 (Point of Care). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the percentage of postponed or canceled appointments was similar between the two groups (adjusted OR = 0.65, [95%CI: 0.22–1.88]; p = 0.42). Similar results were observed for the percentage of postponed or canceled scheduled surgeries (adjusted OR = 0.47, [95%CI: 0.15–1.47]; p = 0.19). The time dedicated to administrative tasks was significantly lowered by 24.7 min in G2 compared to G1 (p < 0.001). 79 patients in G2 (79.0%) completed the survey, and the majority agreed or strongly agreed that it improved care management (79.7%), decreased administrative time (65.8%), reduced the risk of canceled appointments (74.7%) and the traveling time to do COVID-19 test (91.1%). Having point-of-care testing in the clinic in the future seemed more than welcome by 96.6% of patients; 93.6% declared to be less stressed by having the test at the clinic than waiting for the results of the test realized elsewhere. The five healthcare professionals of the primary care center completed the survey, and all agreed that the POCT positively influences the workflow and can be successfully implemented into routine primary care. Conclusions: Our study shows that NAAT-based point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing significantly improved flow management in a primary care setting. POC testing was a feasible and well-accepted strategy by patients and providers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The spread of COVID-19, leading to a global health crisis, has led to major disruptions in performing surgeries and other procedures requiring anesthesia. Despite the availability of vaccinations, the epidemiological burden of COVID-19 is still considerable, hence the routine preoperative COVID testing [17].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%