2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine oral examinations in primary care: Which predictors determine what is done?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the clinician is evaluating an existing restoration with one or more localized clinical features that deviate from ideal and the restoration is considered defective, the clinician should assess whether the tooth in question will truly benefit from a new restoration. When the practitioner is faced with a borderline situation, the patient's past dental history and current caries risk status, and the best treatment for the tooth in question should be considered. If the practitioner is unsure whether the defective area can be removed by polishing or by sealing the affected area, another conservative and predictable approach would be to repair the restoration by removing the deteriorated area and re‐restoring this area only.…”
Section: Examining Restorations and When Repair Or Replacement Is Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the clinician is evaluating an existing restoration with one or more localized clinical features that deviate from ideal and the restoration is considered defective, the clinician should assess whether the tooth in question will truly benefit from a new restoration. When the practitioner is faced with a borderline situation, the patient's past dental history and current caries risk status, and the best treatment for the tooth in question should be considered. If the practitioner is unsure whether the defective area can be removed by polishing or by sealing the affected area, another conservative and predictable approach would be to repair the restoration by removing the deteriorated area and re‐restoring this area only.…”
Section: Examining Restorations and When Repair Or Replacement Is Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first results highlighted the differences in scores between experts and GDPs which were mainly caused by the standardised way of decision-making by GDPs in every day practice regarding BW-frequency (every 36 months) and recall interval (6 months) 35 underpinning the room for improvement as visualised by the model. Further long-term studies are needed to deliver more data on the reliability of this set of clinical vignettes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the decision on whether or not to repair or replace a restoration should not be based solely on clinical and radiographic examination, but more so on the patient's past dental history and current caries risk status …”
Section: Repair Rather Than Replacement Of Restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%