2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine monitoring for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following lower limb arthroplasty: Is it necessary? A prospective study in a UK district general hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, routine laboratory monitoring was not recommended for HIT after TJA. 10,25,27 However, according to our study, the cases of inpatient mortalities in post-THA patients were 13.75 times higher (2.2% vs. 0.16%) and 8.3 times higher than in post-TKA patients (0.58% vs. 0.07%), respectively. It is critical to identify the HIT risk factors and keep in mind that HIT may take place during LMWH exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Thus, routine laboratory monitoring was not recommended for HIT after TJA. 10,25,27 However, according to our study, the cases of inpatient mortalities in post-THA patients were 13.75 times higher (2.2% vs. 0.16%) and 8.3 times higher than in post-TKA patients (0.58% vs. 0.07%), respectively. It is critical to identify the HIT risk factors and keep in mind that HIT may take place during LMWH exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Thus, routine laboratory monitoring was not recommended for HIT after TJA. 7,19,21 However, according to our study, the cases of inpatient mortalities in post-THA patients were 13.75 times higher (2.2% vs 0.16%) and 8.3 times higher than in post-TKA patients (0.58% vs 0.07%), respectively. It is critical to identify the HIT risk factors and keep in mind that HIT may take place during LMWH exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%