Routine Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography Compared to Intra-Operative Cholangiography in Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones

Eshghi, F

doi:10.3923/jms.2008.98.101

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Alhayaf et al studied 90 patients who underwent EUS for suspected biliary tract abnormalities and reported 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity for EUS for diagnosing choledocholithiasis compared with ERCP as the gold standard [ 11 ]. Eshghi and Abdi studied 30 patients with gallstones and suspected choledocholithiasis based on an abnormal serum liver test and CBD dilation >7 mm on TUS who underwent MRCP followed by open cholecystectomy and IOC [ 12 ]. They reported 81.8% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis; the PPV was 94.7% and NPV was 63.3% [ 12 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eshghi and Abdi studied 30 patients with gallstones and suspected choledocholithiasis based on an abnormal serum liver test and CBD dilation >7 mm on TUS who underwent MRCP followed by open cholecystectomy and IOC [ 12 ]. They reported 81.8% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis; the PPV was 94.7% and NPV was 63.3% [ 12 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/AimsBiliary stone disease is one of the most common conditions leading to hospitalization. In addition to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are required in diagnosing choledocholithiasis. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and MRCP against ERCP in diagnosing choledocholithiasis. MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted after prospective collection of data involving 62 suspected choledocholithiasis patients who underwent ERCP from June 2013 to August 2014. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group (31 patients) underwent EUS and the second group (31 patients) underwent MRCP. Then, ERCP was performed in both groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MRCP were determined by comparing them to ERCP, which is the gold standard. ResultsThe male to female ratio was 3:2. The mean ages were 47.25 years in the first group and 52.9 years in the second group. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for EUS were 96%, 57%, 87%, 88%, and 80% respectively, and for MRCP were 81%, 40%, 68%, 74%, and 50%, respectively.ConclusionsEUS is a better diagnostic tool than MRCP for diagnosing choledocholithiasis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is another noninvasive test with a higher sensitivity (80–90%) and specificity (88–100%) compared with transabdominal ultrasound (sensitivity <50%) for choledocholithiasis 4,5 . Although noninvasive, obtaining a timely MRCP can be a challenge and lead to delays in definitive treatment.…”

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is another noninvasive test with a higher sensitivity (80-90%) and specificity (88-100%) compared with transabdominal ultrasound (sensitivity <50%) for choledocholithiasis. 4,5 Although noninvasive, obtaining a timely MRCP can be a challenge and lead to delays in definitive treatment. In addition, it is important to recognize that MRCP may not reveal smaller stones (<6 mm) and those in the periampullary region and provides no therapeutic capability.…”

Section: Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contemporary management of common bile duct stone: What you need to know

Hwang,

Bukur

2023

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choledocholithiasis is a common presentation of symptomatic cholelithiasis encountered by the acute care surgeon. There is a wide spectrum of variation in management of this disease due to evolutions in laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques. Intricacies in management are related to the timing of diagnosis as well as locally available imaging modalities, surgical expertise, and ancillary advanced endoscopy and interventional radiological support. While individual patient demographics and institutional characteristics will determine management of choledocholithiasis, it is incumbent for the treating surgeon to be well versed in all manners of therapy currently available. The objective of this review is to provide an evidence-based summary of the contemporary management of choledocholithiasis.

show abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones

Gurusamy

Giljača

Takwoingi

et al. 2015

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Routine Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography Compared to Intra-Operative Cholangiography in Patients with Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience

Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience

Contemporary management of common bile duct stone: What you need to know

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About