2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00122-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine chest roentgenogram after central venous catheter insertion is not always necessary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple investigators have studied the clinical value of routine CXRs after central venous catheterization, endotracheal intubation, and chest tube placement or removal. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Others have studied the value of daily routine CXRs in a mixed ICU population, or in mechanically ventilated patients only. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of all these routine CXRs has been reported to be low.…”
Section: See Editorial Commentary Page 230mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple investigators have studied the clinical value of routine CXRs after central venous catheterization, endotracheal intubation, and chest tube placement or removal. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Others have studied the value of daily routine CXRs in a mixed ICU population, or in mechanically ventilated patients only. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of all these routine CXRs has been reported to be low.…”
Section: See Editorial Commentary Page 230mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of all these routine CXRs has been reported to be low. [1][2][3][6][7][8][9]11,13,14,[16][17][18][19]21 Investigators comparing a routine CXR strategy with an on-demand CXR strategy were not able to show any difference in outcome measures. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Although those studies indicated that a more restrictive CXR strategy should be safe, a more recent meta-analysis by Ganapathy and colleagues 26 stated that, in those studies, the confidence intervals were wide, and the study populations were small.…”
Section: See Editorial Commentary Page 230mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators have studied the value of daily routine CXRs in a mixed ICU population or in mechanically ventilated patients only [19-28]. The diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of these routine radiographs is now known to be low [1-3,6-10,12-15,17,19,20,22-25,28]. Studies that compared a routine CXR strategy with an ‘on-demand’ CXR strategy did not show any difference in outcome measures [29-34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data currently accumulating in the adult literature have suggested a postoperative chest film may not be necessary if a central line is placed under fluoroscopic guidance [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8]. A single retrospective review of a pediatric population has been published that, similar to our experience, documented a total complication rate of 1.6%, with a complication rate of 0.6% in the subgroup where fluoroscopy was used for placement of the catheters [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%